LICENSING RULES REFORMS
WIN FOR BOLTON TAXI/PH DRIVERS AS COUNCIL LEADERSHIP WITHDRAWS SUPPORT FOR MLS 2
After months of debate, the leadership of Bolton Council has announced it is not supporting “Minimum Licencing Standards 2” - a policy which originally would have charged drivers for having vehicles that were more than ten years old.
The plan had been fiercely contested by drivers across the borough, who warned it could “destroy livelihoods”, and town hall leaders have now announced a change in policy. Council leader Cllr Nick Peel said: “We have decided that we are not going to continue pursuing MLS 2.” He added: “We need to make one thing absolutely clear, the previous Conservative council had years to sort this out. “The last decision on this matter was that there would be a maximum age limit on private hire vehicles of ten years, they all voted for that. This is entirely a decision of the Labour council.” The MLS scheme was first agreed on collectively by Greater Manchester’s ten councils in 2018 and was designed to bring in a set of common standards for the 11,500 private hire vehicles across the city region. Under its previous administration, Bolton Council agreed to the first stage of the MLS proposals which were approved back in September 2021. Speaking at a debate on the subject last May, Conservative deputy leader Cllr Hilary Fairclough said they had secured better terms for Bolton drivers than those in other boroughs. She said: “It originally started in
22
Association has continued to
fiercely oppose the
scheme, demanding instead that it be scrapped in its entirety, claiming that neither Labour nor Con- servative administrations had been listening to them. Now,
following meetings between representatives of
2018 when a Labour Mayor wanted to have minimum standards with the ten then Labour authorities.” She added: “We went out and we got what we believed was the best deal for Bolton, no one else got the same.” But Conservatives announced earlier in July that they now favoured scrapping the scheme. Since it was first discussed, drivers across Bolton had made their fears known about the scheme, which would have
demanded that
taxi/private hire vehicles be no more than five years old on first registration and have been on the road for less than ten years to avoid a charge. They had warned this could have driven them off the road while they also raised concerns that a common livery policy may have made them a bigger target for vandals.
In June, Bolton Council’s leadership announced changes to the policy aimed at meeting these concerns. This included removing the age policy, ensuring that there would be no Greater Manchester- wide common livery and pushing back the new emissions policy from 2028 to 2030. But the Bolton Private Hire
the taxi trade with Cllr Peel alongside deputy leader Cllr Akhtar Zaman and cabinet member for regulatory services and property Cllr Sue Haworth, the council leadership has withdrawn support for MLS2. Council leaders now expect that the status quo will be maintained. Bolton Private Hire Association Secretary Yasif Khan said: “We are very happy with the decision and we would like to thank the administration for realising it would have been really harsh on the drivers. “From day one we were telling them it wasn’t affordable for the drivers, it would have been very difficult to get finance on new cars and it would have been very difficult with the second hand market as well.”
He added: “If its not broken, don’t fix it, as we’ve always said we already do two MoTs. “There has never been any issue with safety and the safety of our passengers is always paramount.” His collegue, Vice
Chair
Mohammed Akhtar, added that he hoped that drivers could now come together with the council and the public to find the best way forward.
AUGUST 2023 PHTM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84
