UBER v SEFTON COUNCIL HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT:
CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS & LGMPA 1976
Article by Neil Morley MD Travis Morley Law
www.travismorley.com
On 28th July 2023 the High Court handed down its decision in the case of Uber Britannia Limited v Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council & Others [2023] EWHC 1975 (KB).
It had been tasked with hearing a claim, brought by Uber Britannia Limited (“Uber”) for clarification on contractual relationships under the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976. Uber raised, as outlined in the judgement (at para. 4), the question:
“In order to operate lawfully under Part II of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976, is a licensed operator who accepts a booking from a passenger required to enter as principal into a contractual obligation with the passenger to provide the journey which is the subject of the booking?”
Effectively, it asks whether or not contractual relationships between operators, drivers and passengers are governed by the statute. The answer to which could have implications for judicial observations, regarding worker rights, by the Supreme Court (Uber BV v Aslam & Others [2021] UKSC 5).
A prior High Court judgement, initiated by Uber London Limited, found the Private Hire Vehicles (London) Act 1998 does govern so in London (Uber London Limited v Transport for London [2021] EWHC 3290 (Admin)). Consequently, Uber now sought to clarify the position, under similar legislation, outside London.
In these proceedings, Uber asserted the answer to the question must be “yes” and was supported, as intervenors, by Bolt Services UK Limited (“Bolt”) and the App Drivers & Couriers Union (“ADCU”).
10
Veezu Holdings Limited (“Veezu”) and D.E.L.T.A Merseyside Limited (“Delta”), also intervenors, asserted the answer was “no”.
Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (“Sefton”) remained neutral (at para. 5).
Finding in favour of Uber’s view, Mrs Justice Foster DBE ruled (at para. 65):
“…the question posed is to be answered “yes” It followed therefore, in the opinion of the court, that:
“…[i]nviting and accepting a booking inevitably in my judgement connote the formation of a contract with the passenger....” (at para. 75).
The court referenced, in coming to its conclusion, the construction of the statute and, in particular, the wording of certain key provisions. Attention, amongst others, being drawn to s.56(1) (at para. 65). Comparisons were notably made to the precedent set for London (at para. 70):
“Given the similarities of context and statutory intention between the two Acts…the findings of the [London] case must read over directly to the present situation.”
Additional consideration was applied to interlinking matters of operating models, market competition and, foremost, public safety (at paras. 81-85). The issue of VAT was dismissed as “…irrelevant…” (at para. 85).
Such an interpretation now means that licensing authorities, as Transport for London (“TfL”) has in London, should ascertain whether private hire operators lawfully comply with this requirement.
Whilst the court notes its decision will render “…certain types of service model …no longer capable of operation under the statute…” (at para. 82), it is unclear how the task of assessing licence holder compliance is to be administered or enforced. The approach adopted by TfL may, as yet, prove a starting point.
AUGUST 2023 PHTM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84
