In this month’s edition we feature more road traffic issues relevant to the trade supplied by Patterson Law. These questions are based on real enquiries that we have received from professional drivers this month. If you need any advice on motoring matters please email or call 01626 359800 for free legal advice. For regular updates on road traffic law follow us on or



I was stopped for using my phone while driving in January last year. I was sat in traffic and I admit that I was looking at my phone, but I wasn’t holding it. It was resting on my lap at the time. I missed the lights ahead of me turning green and a police offi-

cer walked over and issued me a ticket. I got a summons to court, and I pleaded not guilty. I now have a trial coming up. I was supposed to be in last year, but it was adjourned due to coronavirus. I’m now worried that the change in law means that I might be found guilty. Can you help?

Don’t worry, the law hasn’t changed yet. And even if it did, it would only be for offences moving forward. A change in the law does not have retrospective effect.

Your case seems to be on the basis that the phone was not handheld. As the law currently stands, to commit an offence the phone must be held in your hand, even if you accept using it. If it was resting on your lap, then that is not an offence. I would like to make representations to the prosecution service to try to persuade them to withdraw the case. We can have those negotiations behind the scenes and try to stop the matter from going to trial.

However, I am concerned that the prosecution may try to amend the charge. Even though you were not using a hand- held phone whilst driving, there is an offence of ‘not being in proper control’, where all the prosecution must show is that you were not in full control of your vehicle or you did not have a full view of the traffic ahead. They may well make an application to amend the charge at the hearing. If they do, we will oppose. They ought to make any such applications within six months and are well outside of that time, and we would argue that this case is not exceptional enough to allow them to do it.

In my opinion I believe this may turn into a legal battle with the prosecution about applications to amend. You will need a solicitor to make those arguments for you. They are complicated. Call us so we can get to work straight away.

84 A

I was caught speeding by an undercover police car. I feel angry about this. She was just following me for ages and I didn’t even know it was a police car. When she pulled me over they hadn’t even record- ed my speed properly, just followed me and said

that I was going at 40 in a 30. Are they even allowed to do that? I thought that it had to be a camera or a speed gun that caught you. Also, the road is two lanes and to me it looks like a 40 limit. I don’t think there are any signs but how do I know that it’s a 30?

A 30mph limit is denoted in a built-up area by a system of street lighting in place no more than 200 yards apart. 20, 40 and 50 limits are noted by signs. If there are no streetlights or signs, it is usually either a national speed limit or 70 if a motorway.

Call me so that we can have a look at the road and what is in place – whether it be signs, streetlights or a national speed limit.

Regarding the method by which they have recorded your speed, it sounds very much like a follow check. There are several ways that the police can record a vehicle’s speed, and speed guns/cameras is just one of them. A follow check is a recognised method that the police use where they maintain an even distance behind the rear of your vehicle for a minimum of 2/10 of a mile.

The police do have guidelines which they have to follow, and although not following the guidelines in the strictest terms is not automatically a defence, if they have not followed their guidelines properly then we may be able to cast some doubt on the accuracy of the speed. I would also like to have a look at whether 40mph was the speed at which they had to travel to catch you up, and not the actual speed at which you were travelling.

If you are at court already, we need to request a copy of the evidence urgently so that we can go through it with a fine-toothed comb and determine exactly how accurate their check was.

If you are not at court, then to get this evidence we will need to reject any fixed penalty or speed awareness course you have been offered to get the matter to court, and then get the evidence.


I was stopped for drink driving last week when I was going to the shops. I fully accept that I was above the limit and I truly regret what I have done. It is very out of character for me. My reading was 43 in breath. I don’t think it’s that high. But I have read

online that you can argue exceptional hardship to avoid a ban. Is this something you can help with?

APRIL 2021

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96