search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The increasing need for storage across the European block has been driven fundamentally via increased yields and harvest production. Europe has established itself as one of the world’s top 5 major agricultural exporters, seeing exports of cereals grow by 50 percent or 42mlnt between the period 2005 and 2015 to 107 million tonnes. Whilst all 28 countries have witnessed growth to some extent, it has been Eastern states of Romania, Bulgaria and Poland that have added a combined 22.85 million tonnes of capacity from 2005 to 2015. Although combined investment was made by the trade, processing consumers and port  in assets as mentioned previously.


   need peaks at harvests until the time of actual export. Table 1 shows the breakdown of storage capacity by country throughout the EU, with estimated shortages and surpluses based upon the commissions average storage requirement when taking into account cereal production, exports and import needs. Typically net importing nations such as the UK and Germany, run storage assets beyond capacity due to the ability to   encouraged the use of stock management, turning both growers and processing consumers into price makers rather than price takers. The continuing evolution of European Common Agricultural Policy has positioned EU markets closer to international trade, following the removal 


The trend for increasing on-farm storage and capacity at the point of production is a common theme across the world and just one of many factors that is evolving the agricultural supply chain. The freedom of information and speed of communication is enabling growers to make better informed decisions, which with increasing capacity to store crops, can delay marketing decisions. This rebalancing of the market pendulum is dictating the timing and terms upon which farmers sell grain, having  has created an environment of complacency from consumption, as  and collateral, have responded to increasing yield growth and overall production by building assets, particularly in exporting regions of Eastern EU turning them into price makers rather than price takers.


Figure 2: EU Member States with biggest Storage Increased between 2005 and 2015 (EU Commission)


8,184 + 11% 6,741 + 18% + 28% 5,430 + 100% + 40% + 647% 1,584 + 6%


1,016 + 17%


+ 13%


1,019 + 21%


- 35% BG DE DK FI FR HU PL  11 | ADMISI - The Ghost In The Machine | March/April 2018 RO ES SW UK + 19% + 45% + 29% + 99% + 132% + 1.872% + 598% 2,114 + 134% 2,418 18%


7,239 + 4% + 8%


7,441 Individual farm


Full EU Commission report available at https://  market-observatory/crops/doc/storage-logistics- 


George Eddell E: george.eddell@admisi.com T: +44(0) 20 7716 8054


2015 STORAGE CAPACITY BY MEMBER STATE VS EU COMMISSIONS ESTIMATED 


MEMBER STATE 2015 EU STORAGE CAPACITY


Austria Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus


Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France


Germany Greece


Hungary Ireland Italy


Latvia Lithuania


Luxembourg Malta


Netherlands Poland


Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain


Sweden UK


 Cooperative 8,874


5,065,549 3,820,630 14,032,575 2,504,676 311,292


11,427,481 9,954,900 1,470,806 7,559,500 90,870,486 48,104,734 3,144,337 20,144,534 2,593,903 15,683,826 2,377,920 5,615,498 170,655 88,000


2,275,630 24,368,366 1,913,580 23,377,236 5,875,219 609,635


29,905,814 6,498,430 19,517,051 359,282,263


Processing industry Wholesale/Trade


  


-10,370 -9,791 6,623


-2,619 -2,561 -1,398 -1,344 -1,071 -1,028 -652 -604 -449 -319 -57 -15 7


56 61


135 370


1,119 1,184 2,726 2,984 5,131 5,264 5,817


18,745


 AVERAGE NEED 


65% 83% 79% 79% 86% 69% 81% 68% 70% 80% 91% 85% 82% 75%


100% 100% 275% 111% 177% 124% 111% 125% 156% 111% 158% 129% 141% 126%


Transportation hub (including ports)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32