search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
6 • Finance, Legal & Accounting Hybrid price tag


Te pandemic was a catalyst for exploring different working models, but what are the costs of continuing to do so? CFO Calvin Sellers reveals all. Words: Priya Raj


A


ccording to the Office for National Statistics, 28% of working adults in the UK


hybrid worked between January and March 2025. Calvin Sellers, a consultant CFO who’s worked with multiple high-growth businesses, credits the pandemic for the increased interest in alternative working models, but five years later, some companies are choosing to return to a standard in-office working week. Here, Calvin discusses the costs associated with switching, as well as the best options for businesses today.


SHOULD ALL BUSINESSES CONTINUE TO HYBRID WORK? This operates as a continuous spectrum. Different organisations will look to place themselves where they believe their ROI [return on investment] is greatest at that particular point in time. It’s critical for organisations to keep [this] under continual review to ensure they can adapt to changes in external forces, internal pressures and opportunities.


HOW IMPORTANT IS THE WORKING MODEL TO A COMPANY’S FINANCES? As CFO, I view costs associated with people as short-term and long- term investments. Maximising the ROI is core to a business’s success. Differential direct costs along the spectrum from fully on-site through to fully remote include property costs and commitments, office equipment, [but also] commuting costs, time and work-life balance, and investment into culture building. As we examine these components, it’s important to keep focus on the ‘R’, which is the value generation to the business. Examples of the return include creativity and employee engagement.


WHAT ARE THE BIGGEST COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH A HYBRID WORKFORCE? Hybrid, while rightly popular, often ends up being the most expensive as companies carry both office and remote costs. These include


Te Finance & Business Guide - brought to you by APL Media • Wednesday 22 October 2025


HYBRID WORKING/PEXELS


inappropriate office sizing — too small, meaning people can’t collaborate when required, or too large, creating wasted space, often on specific days where utilisation rates are [generally] lower like Mondays and Fridays. Duplicate costs for IT and cybersecurity also factor in; or perhaps worse — inadequate cybersecurity from home. Plus, there are coordination and collaboration costs like space management.


IS A REMOTE, INTERNATIONAL WORKFORCE ACTUALLY THE CHEAPEST OPTION? For businesses under pressure to cut costs, remote workforces can be a


powerful level — provided they plan carefully for IT, compliance, quality and culture. The real savings arise not just from closing offices, but from redesigning how people work, connect and collaborate. There can be some hidden costs associated with [an international workforce]: the potential for creating a tax and legal presence with a remote or hybrid international workforce as well as other legal and compliance costs like local labour laws, employee rights and mandatory benefits. If international talent prefers to operate outside of a payroll-based relationship for tax efficiency, higher rates may be payable to offset benefits, holidays and security.


WHAT SHOULD BUSINESSES WEIGH UP BEFORE MOVING TOWARDS REMOTE WORKING? Focusing on how your business evolves, becomes more agile and gets stronger is time well spent for any modern business leader. Leaders should think carefully about how [they] will replace in- office touchpoints with deliberate practices that keep people aligned and engaged, whether a change in organisational structure will improve the quality of products and services, and what investment is required to ensure your systems, data protection and support scale to a fully distributed team.


ADVERTISEMENT FEATURE


Why CEOs and COOs are turning to AI to streamline contract review


For many medium to large organisations, contracts are the lifeblood of commercial activity


Every new supplier, customer, partnership or service is underpinned by a legally binding agreement. Yet for many CEOs and COOs, the contract review process has become a silent bottleneck; slowing down sales cycles, draining resources and exposing the business to unnecessary risk. Traditional contract review is a


labour-intensive process. Legal teams pore over documents line by line, ensuring compliance with corporate standards and identifying hidden risks. For companies handling hundreds or even thousands of agreements a year, this approach is costly, time-consuming, and often fails to keep pace with commercial demands. The result? Missed SLAs, frustrated stakeholders and delayed


ToughtRiver’s AI-based platform can review contracts in minutes


revenue recognition. Much insight gleaned from contract data is missed without an ability to see it altogether with a bird’s eye view. This is where Legal AI Contract


Review Software is transforming the landscape. Platforms such as ThoughtRiver use advanced artificial intelligence to review contracts at speed and scale, flagging risks, inconsistencies and deviations from corporate “playbooks”. The technology acts as an intelligent triage system; prioritising what needs human attention while giving instant clearance to routine or low- risk contracts.


FOR THE C-SUITE, THE BENEFITS ARE CLEAR: • Faster deal velocity. AI accelerates contract turnaround times, reducing delays in onboarding suppliers or closing customer deals.


• Optimised resources. Legal teams can focus on strategic, high-value matters rather than repetitive reviews, reducing overhead costs without increasing risk.


• Consistency and compliance. AI ensures every contract is checked against corporate standards and


legal risks, protecting the business while maintaining speed.


• Scalability. As contract volumes grow, AI delivers consistency and efficiency without requiring a proportional increase in headcount.


Crucially, adopting Legal AI is not about replacing lawyers. It’s about augmenting them and freeing skilled professionals from routine tasks so they can act as true business


partners. For executives under pressure to drive growth, reduce costs and maintain agility, this shift can be the difference between being held back by legal processes and unlocking new high-value commercial opportunities. In today’s competitive and


turbulent environment, the question is no longer whether Legal AI has a role to play. It’s whether your business can afford to delay its adoption.


Contact ToughtRiver for more information


E: info@thoughtriver.com Visit: thoughtriver.com


AI-powered contract review, analysis and workflows since 2016.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28