NEWS
Agents who comply at once with new ‘total pricing’ rules fear they will appear expensive compared with rivals that are slow to adapt
Agents concerned CMA’s pricing rules will create ‘two-tier’ market
Juliet Dennis and Ella Sagar
Travel agents fear new pricing rules set by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) will confuse customers and could penalise those in compliance if prices appear higher than those of non-compliant rivals. They also say many operators
have yet to make the required changes to systems ahead of the three-month deadline for implementation. The CMA issued
note to show the exchange rate used to calculate destination charges. Agents report that complying
with the new rules is time-consuming and “needlessly complicated”, and said very few customers had raised a complaint about fees in destination. Some agents warn the changed
STORY TOP
guidance in November on requirements that all unavoidable fees and taxes payable in destination be included in total prices, and sent letters to about 100 businesses warning they had three months to comply or risk enforcement action. As Travel Weekly has previously
reported, the rules require firms to show a ‘total price’, with the amount to ‘pay now’ and the amount to ‘pay at the property’, plus an explanatory
travelweekly.co.uk
regulations risk creating false price differences between companies adhering to the rules by presenting higher ‘all-in prices’ and those which don’t, particularly while firms adjust to the change. Others say they have
invested in new tools and training and redesigned
advertising, while many operators
have yet to adjust their pricing. Agents have also highlighted
concerns about using ready-made deals from operators, the difficulties of dynamic packaging using bed banks, and complications of fluctuating exchange rates and city fees yet to be confirmed for 2027 and 2028. The Travel Network Group
and Advantage Travel Partnership
confirmed they were preparing members for compliance, but TTNG chief operating officer Stephanie Slark warned differing speeds of adoption across the trade “may lead to short-term differences in how prices appear”. Agents urged all operators to
adjust prices on booking systems and on promotional offers, with Fred Olsen Travel retail director Paul Hardwick adding: “We are looking to take a lead from our supplier partners.” Idle Travel director Tony Mann
said “the majority” of operators were yet to include full pricing in offers, noting: “I’m hoping for a quick change where they all come in line (so we) don’t look more expensive.” Deben Travel owner Lee Hunt
said multi-centre quotes were particularly difficult, and that the agency’s current window cards allowed room for only one price. He added: “[In the past] we’d
only find out taxes when people booked; now, we have to do it on all enquiries.”
Blue Bay Travel personal travel
consultant David Coulter said there was a risk of “a two-tier system”, as customers would be drawn to non- compliant prices, especially online, and said customers could be confused about the upfront cost to pay. Simon Clark-Jones, chief
executive of Your Travel Consultant, said agencies risked being “caught out” and flagged the challenge of using bed banks and flight consolidators which would not ordinarily calculate additional costs. Henbury Travel managing
director Richard Slater said agents needed clearer examples from the CMA of how pricing should look and said he had highlighted the issue to his consumer media contacts. Daniele Broccoli, managing
director of trade-only operator Typically Holidays, said local fees payable in destination had “never been a problem” during his 40 years in travel, with the changes creating a “needless complication”, particularly for multi-centre trips.
19 FEBRUARY 2026 5
PICTURES: Shutterstock/Sven Hansche, Moiz 8008
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60