search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Barriers to growth, sustainability and accessibility dominated debate at the Pacific Continued from page, page 96


imperative the government acts immediately to implement the proposals.” But the UK Board of Airline


Representatives insisted the risks of airline insolvency “remain overstated” and said: “We do not support a passenger levy. Te vast majority of consumers would never receive any benefit.” Chief executive Dale Keller


said: “Te EC estimates only 0.07% of passengers could be affected by airline bankruptcy and, of these, only 12% would require organised assistance in geting home.” He warned the costs of


collecting a levy “are likely to be significantly greater” than the report suggests. Airlines UK chief executive


Tim Alderslade agreed, saying: “Passengers already pay over £3 billion a year in APD. Bringing passengers home through voluntary rescue fares works extremely well.” Insolvency trade association


R3 backed the levy but objected to changing the UK’s insolvency rules to allow a failed airline to operate repatriation flights. President Duncan Swiſt


said: “One reason an insolvent airline’s planes are grounded is that planes are vulnerable to creditor action. It’s easy for a supplier to block a plane at an overseas airport.” He also warned the proposal


“will have an impact on creditors’ risk analysis when it comes to trading with or lending to an airline and could affect access to finance”. Te industry has until


June 20 to respond to the recommendations as part of the consultation on the government’s Aviation 2050 strategy paper.


Expert highlights tourism growth but revenue drop


International tourism “has grown dramatically” but spending per head has fallen, according to Professor John Koldowski, special adviser to Pata chief executive Mario Hardy. Koldowski noted global interna-


tional arrivals topped 1.4 billion in 2018 and told the Pata Summit: “Te


94 16 MAY 2019


Economist warns trade war is threat to growth


Ian Taylor


Global economic growth is slowing and will continue to slow amid growing threats of a trade war, a leading economist warned the Pata Summit in the Philippines. Andrew Staples of Te Economist


Corporate Network said: “Te global economy slowed in 2018. It’s slowing again in 2019 and will continue to slow in 2020. Staples described the outlook as one of “growing risk” and told


Andrew Staples


the summit: “Trade is the biggest concern. We should all be concerned about the conflict between the US and China. Some of the tension is about who will run the global economy.” He characterised this as “a batle


for digital supremacy, about who will set the rules for the next stage,” adding: “Te batle around 5G [mobile infrastructure] is part of it.” Staples identified a number of


other risks but said: “We’re very concerned the US-China trade war could become a global trade war and


We’re concerned


the US-China trade war could become a global trade war and slow everything down


slow everything down. It is creating uncertainty and increasing costs.” Tensions hit a new level last week


ahead of planned US-China trade talks. Staples said: “On Sunday, it looked like they would do a deal. On Monday, Trump said, ‘Te deal is off’ and he imposed another 15% tariff on $200-billion worth of Chinese goods.” Staples summarised the issues


between the governments saying: “China wants to be global leader in artificial intelligence and 5G by 2025. Te US does not want that to happen.” However, amid the warnings,


Staples said: “Te mega-trends are positive and what are driving economic growth.” He advised: “Position yourself for short-term volatility but long-term growth.”


structural components of travel and tourism are strong. Scheduled air capacity is growing. Arrivals are up and spending is up overall.” But he noted: “[Average]


spending per arrival dropped from $1,154 in 2014 to $1,008 in 2017, the lowest since 2009.” Koldowski said: “Asia-Pacific


receipts look good, but revenue per arrival is falling. Demand is strong. It is cheaper than ever to travel. “[But] the inbound travel mix is


changing [and] the length of stay is perhaps declining.”


He added: “We need to


understand the impact. If we’re serious about sustainability, numbers are not what we should be focusing on.”


travelweekly.co.uk


Professor John Koldowski

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100