NEWS SPECIAL REPORT


Eco concerns ‘drop’ A


Aito consumer survey finds fall in focus on sustainability of travel choices. Juliet Dennis reports


survey of Aito customers has revealed a slight drop year on year in concerns about sustainability.


Of the 12,000 client responses


from 40 companies within Aito, The Specialist Travel Association, including operators, travel agents and tourist boards, 33% were concerned about their carbon footprint – down from 37% a year ago. In total, 28% of respondents to a survey for the association’s 10th annual Travel Insights report said they do


not consider the carbon footprint of


o er the


otprint of


their travel when makin booking de sion But R y B rk


lwhenmaking decisions.


Roy Barker, d r ctor of , diirector of


customer data and insights comp Spike, which conducted the survey


mpany


on Aito’s behalf, pointed out: “That means 70% do.”


Sustainability credentials There was also a slight fall in the proportion of travellers who regarded the sustainability of a travel firm or holiday destination as important. Less than half (47%) said


they always or often consider the sustainability credentials of a company as ‘of significant importance’, with 48% saying the same regarding a destination. A year ago these figures were 54% and 52% respectively. The research


consider a company’s sustainability cred


o r spondeof rf espondentts ne onsider a comp


also found that 21% s n ver or seldom s s


o dentials when boo


Overall customer satisfaction levels with Aito firms continue to be high, with agents receiving a higher score than tour operators. According to this year’s Travel Insights report, 91% of


respondents expressed above-average satisfaction levels with their holiday, slightly down on last year’s 94%. The figure was higher among customers of just Aito


agents, 96% of whom ranked their satisfaction above average, compared with 91% of operators’ clients. This is thought to be due to personal rapport with agents. When customers were asked why they booked with a certain company, 94% cited expertise, service levels and


alswhen booking. 28%


Consumers who don’t consider the carbon footprint of their travel


Similarly, concern among


travellers about helping local economies has dropped since last year, with 17% seldom or never considering this factor, compared with 12% last year. However, the survey revealed 75% of people do believe travel is a ‘force for good’.


Booking variance Despite this, Barker said consumer sentiment on sustainability did not appear to be backed up when it came to making travel decisions. “Although 75% say it’s a force


for good, this does not appear to be a key driver [of holiday bookings] based on the data,” he said, adding: “People generally don’t think, ‘I want a sustainable holiday’, but they do think, ‘I want to go to X and do Y and if I can do that in a sustainable way then great’.” Aito operators said price and


destination ranked above sustainability among clients but eco credentials could be a way to stand out from rivals. Ramble Worldwide sales and


marketing director Jim Eite said: “Sustainability is a way companies can differentiate themselves.” Journey Latin America director


Sarah Bradley said clients wanted to mitigate the impact of travel by supporting natural habitats, local enterprises and communities. “Carbon offsetting comes further down the [priority] list,” she said.


Roy Barker, Spike


support, up from 88% last year. For specialist agency customers, the figure was 97%. More than half of respondents said they spend more than £2,500 per person on experiential holidays, with nearly 80% willing to pay more for a better experience. More than 80% of those surveyed were aged over 50


and 66% over 60, with 95% in an average or above average financial position. More than 80% said holidays were an important part of their lifestyle. Roy Barker, director of Spike, which carried out the


survey, said: “Your customers love you, want to travel and demographics are on your side.”


8


4 APRIL 2024


travelweekly.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68