The power of Acon Research
Praconer-‐Led Acon Research can be empowering for praconers, as it enables them to idenfy and enquire into real problems or issues that they encounter in their work. The outcomes of their research can empower them to make changes in their pracce which they might not otherwise have been able to do. For example, in 2014, researchers at Colchester Instute drew on the work of Dweck et al (e.g. 2010) to invesgate what movates young people on vocaonal courses to make progress in maths and English (the learners were working towards GCSEs, having not achieved grade Cs in school). The team found that staff and learners had quite different views on the topic and that there were some clear acons that staff could take, for example, to improve learning conversaons and the seng of learning goals which connect the development of English and maths skills with vocaonal excellence. The findings were incorporated in the college’s Connuous Improvement Plan, an empowering outcome for the researchers who had led the work. The Spelling Strategies workshop that was offered to vocaonal staff during the research project became a popular CPD acvity at the college.
The PLAR process itself also develops praconers’ capacity to crically queson their experience and reflect on their acons. For example, a researcher from Key Training, reflected on her own experience of having Irlen Syndrome and discovering the benefits of using colour overlays when she was reading on page and screen. This led her to develop an assessment for learners using colour overlays and to research the impact of this support strategy on her learners.
Mulmodal Reporng
Praconers on the naonal PLAR programme were encouraged to use mulmodal reporng approaches, such as the producon of videos, blogs and deeply layered posters. By promong the use of mulmodal reporng, we drew on the work of Cope and Kalantzis (2000). We will share the raonale behind this approach in more depth in a later arcle. In brief, we hoped to encourage the producon of reports that were accessible, more rapidly assimilated and more memorable for praconers who rarely have the luxury of me to study in a self-‐directed way. In regional research peer groups, we discussed mulmodality in the context of the researchers’ audience who, we felt collecvely, would be largely other praconers, as well as managers and the wider educaon sector and public and who could access reports freely on the programme website. Furthermore, we ancipated and found that, as praconers became more proficient and confident in exploring a mulmodal approach in recording and presenng their research data, they felt more confident in exploring similar teaching approaches with their learners.
Literacies PLAR projects
As well as the work carried out around marking and feedback and introvert/extrovert English language learners, there were many projects over 2 years that centred on literacies (English, maths and ICT). Literacies research in 2015 included the following: • Resing GCSE Maths: do growth mindset messages make a difference? (see Sarah Richards’ arcle in this journal)
• Will our Virtual Maths Centre (Maths Central) increase learner confidence and greater success in maths skills?
• Will compleng an addional formave assessment tool, prior to undertaking pracce tests, help to improve pass rates for Funconal Skills Maths L2?
• What is effecve pracce in the marking of spelling, punctuaon and grammar? • If ESOL learners are disadvantaged when moving on to Funconal Skills, how can we bridge the gap?
17
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53