search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
18 THE CLIMATE CHALLENGE


Tackling the myths around off site BNG delivery


Nathan Jenkinson of Environment Bank explores some of the myths around achieving biodiversity net gain off sets, and puts the case for wide usage of Habitat Banks.


O


ffsite biodiversity net gain (BNG) is a much misunderstood subject. The most cited issues, expense


and lack of local supply, aren’t diffi cult to refute, but beyond that, offsite offers more options and advantages than people might think.


Through our work, we’ve established the nation’s largest network of Habitat Banks across the length and breadth of England, and in so doing, developed market leading insight into just how effective offsite BNG can be for biodiversity and developers, when used properly.


The regulatory changes that have come about since BNG was launched in February 2024 mean that with regard to balancing biodiversity outcomes and enabling prompt development consenting and delivery, it has only become more important to ensure that biodiversity requirements (in the case of BNG now termed the ‘biodiversity gain objective’) are being fulfi lled in the most effective and effi cient way. In most cases, this is best done offsite.


THE MAJOR MYTHS


If we examine the two most cited diffi culties when looking at offsite BN  cost and lack of local supply  they don’t hold up under scrutiny.


First, lack of local supply  it shouldn’t be surprising that it took time for good national coverage of Habitat Banks to progress, and now the number of Habitat Banks is increasing rapidly. There are currently more than a hundred Habitat Banks on the biodiversity gain sites register, and many more are still in development. Viewed as a whole, these sites are found across England, from Cornwall to Northumberland, ensuring that developers will be able to buy Biodiversity Units within a reason able distance of their building site in most cases.


Second, cost. While it’s true that Biodiversity Units don’t come cheap, the pricing depends heavily on the habitat


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


type, and for smaller projects, fractional Biodiversity Units can be purchased from pragmatic unit providers to ensure that the purchase remains relative to the site size and BNG costs don’t become a viability issue.


ONSITE VS OFFSITE Since February 2024, it has been mandatory for developments to demonstrate a minimum 10% net gain for biodiversity delivered by the scheme (note there are a few exempt development types).


It can be challenging to create habitats that meet BNG requirements within development sites, particularly those that are spatially constrained, or where underlying site characteristics, such as soil chemistry and hydrology, mean it will be diffi cult to establish habitats of benefi t to biodiversity. Integrating as much BNG onsite as possible can also have unintended consequences, such as sterilising future developable land. When we consider offsite BNG as the alternative, these potential issues are reduced. The developer can look at a selection of nearby Habitat Banks, and we’ll provide them with a market ready solution that suits their requirements, whilst staying as local to the scheme as possible.


Establishing Habitat Banks for offsite BN isn’t simply a matter of fi nding parcels of land that are already primed for rewilding; in fact, thanks to the aptitude of our ecology, land, and habitat delivery professionals, we can turn various types of low-yielding farmland into rich cradles for biodiversity.


Even when a developer can’t purchase Biodiversity Units within the same local planning authority (LPA) or national character area (NCA) as their construction project, there are mechanisms in place to help look for the next best option in neighbouring LPAs.


THE CLIENT RELATIONSHIP The other question that offsite BNG raises


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92