HEATING, VENTILATION & SERVICES 69
RADIATING ‘CARBON INTENSITY’ BENEFITS
Joanna Crown of WMS Underfl oor Heating assesses the ‘carbon intensity’ of underfl oor heating versus traditional radiator systems and explains why radiant technology ticks the boxes when it comes to embodied carbon reduction.
T
here are many factors to consider when assessing the carbon intensity of a home heating system – from meeting the demands of new build regulations, to maimising effi ciency and ensuring all the technologies specifi ed work in harmony.
CARBON INTENSITY COMPARISON Following the low water temperature update to the Building Regulations and Part L (June 2022), the housebuilding industry is going through some huge changes and challenges.
Aside from meeting the needs of regulations, assessing the embodied carbon of a heating system requires various factors to be considered, from product lifecycle, material volume and the carbon impact to manufacture each product. When taking these factors into account, underfl oor heating systems have been shown to be 93% less carbon intensive than traditional steel radiators. This dramatic statistic was calculated using a Government report relating to the carbon impact of manufacturing building materials, which states that the manufacture of iron and steel products have a 7.1 MTCO2
dioxide equivalent), compared with plastic products, which have a 3 MTCO2
e (metric tons of carbon e
– 58% less than iron and steel. It’s clear to see that plastic underfl oor heating pipe is signifi cantly better from a carbon point of view to produce when compared with steel and the benefi ts don’t stop there.
MATERIAL VOLUME IN THE SPOTLIGHT When calculating and comparing material volume, in a house with 10 rooms over two fl oors, a standard steel radiator system would require 222.6
kg of material, whereas the equivalent underfl oor heating system would reuire 42% less material (129.4 kg). However, to meet the recently introduced standards for new builds, low fl ow temperature radiators will need to be much larger than traditional products. So, as well as taking up more wall space and creating interior layout headaches, the volume of material required for these larger steel radiators would be signifi cantly more than their traditional counterparts, creating a stark contrast to the minimal volume of material reuired to complete an underfl oor heating system.
PRODUCT LIFECYCLES
Considering the carbon impact of property means not only looking at products selected for the initial build itself, but also over the lifetime of the building. Traditional radiators have a relatively short lifecycle and are only expected to last for around 25 years. So, as well as being less effi cient than underfl oor heating when insitu once decommissioned, they become a waste product in a relatively short space of time. While they can be recycled, the carbon produced during the recycling process is extremely high.
AS UNDERFLOOR HEATING IS BY NATURE A LOW TEMPERATURE SYSTEM, IT PAIRS PERFECTLY WITH HEAT PUMPS WHICH DELIVER THE MOST EFFICIENT (COP) LEVEL WHEN RUNNING AT 35-45°C
WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92