search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
50 INDUSTRY VIEWFINDER


PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES With Parts F and O relating to ventilation and overheating respectively, rather than regulating the actual building fabric itself, we wondered whether housebuilders were ‘insourcing’ the planning and design of their builds to comply with these uplifted, and, in the case of Part O, brand new standards. As might be expected, most of our respondents were outsourcing the decisions that would ensure that adequate ventilation was provided to dwellings in order to comply with Part F, to their architect (44%). However, perhaps surprisingly, 21% were dealing with this inhouse (plus 12% choosing ‘builder’), and only 9% were leaving compliance on ventilation to an M&E engineer, and 8% to a subcontractor.


BUILDING DESIGN CHANGES Many housebuilders are grappling with a seemingly intractable


problem in complying with Part L, which requires an increase in airtihtness and fabric effi ciency, and also eetin art , which won’t allow excessive levels of overheating of a dwelling. In some cases this has led design teams to have to confront clients with plans for smaller windows than they would be prepared to accept, to mitigate overheating. We asked our survey sample how challenging it has been so far to retain their existing building design (in terms of the aesthetic look of the external facade), while at the same time complying with Part O as well as Part L? The answers showed that this was a problem even for smaller builders, who made up the majority of our survey. In total, 74% said it was challenging to some degree, and 21% admitted it was ‘very challenging,’ which means this is a major problem to solve in coming months if homes and apartment buildings are not to look dramatically different in coming years.


How challenging is retaining your existing window sizes and overall design look, in meeting Part O on overheating while meeting Part L?


CONCLUSION T


here remain a host of issues to address in order to ensure that the new Part L is practical to achieve for the broadest rane of housebuilders, with con icts eistin between the regulation’s aims of air-tight construction, and both ventilation and overheating concerns. Virtually all of the barriers cited in our 2022 Industry


iewfi nder survey had becoe ore acute in this years study, from skills, to costs, to homeowner awareness. The only factor that was unchanged was carbon reduction measurements. Part L has been a legal requirement for all developments for a year and a half, and alongside Parts F and the new Part O, represents one of the biggest jumps in quality for


housebuilding in many years, driven by the UK’s general, but urgent, need to cut carbon.


Our survey shows that while the new standards may be achievable without many housebuilders having to make drastic chanes or invest inordinate sus, its a diffi cult task to introduce much higher levels of insulation, fabric design rigour, and renewables to existing designs. For SME builders, virtually everything is a challenge currently, and this is just another one. Moreover, the jump in build performance, new tech and change of housebuilding approaches generally that will be needed to meet the Future Homes Standard (75-80% fewer emissions) in just over a year’s time, is going to be a huge leap.


PRODUCED IN ASSOCIATION WITH


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84