search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
4 INDUSTRY NEWS


FROM THE EDITOR


James Parker


So the Competition and Markets Authority is refusing to turn its weaponry away from the issue of whether or not housebuilders are guilty of deliberate land banking. The CMA has producing its fi nal two ‘working papers’ detailing its current, very thorough investigation before it reports early next year on the issue.


The organisation has a broad reach, and is looking at 5,800 individual sites “held in the land banks of 11 of the largest housebuilders.” It revealed land in long-term land banks is equivalent to approximately 658,000 plots, while the “short-term land bank” equated to 522,000 plots.


ON THE COVER


Industry Advocate: Brian Berry looks at how SME


housebuilders fared in 2023


Round Table Report: Identifying the best way forward on SuDS in new developments in 2024


Industry Viewfi nder: Reviewing progress on Part L, F and O, one year on


HOUSEBUILDER & DEVELOPER


DEC/JAN 2024


The CMA will report in the New Year, but so far, it says it has found that “land equivalent to over a million plots is held in land banks, in most areas by several different builders.” The CMA is “seeking feedback,” and in particular, whether local competition is being negatively impacted in the small number of areas where large amounts of developable land are controlled by a small number of housebuilders.


The CMA says it recognises that housebuilders “need to hold a pipeline of land as sites pass through the planning system, but added that it was “concerned that competition may be being distorted if land is held for longer and in larger quantities than is necessary.” The body is attempting to show that it recognises the logjams within the planning system, making recommendations on speeding the process, but is fi rmly focused on land banking at the same time as a perceived cause of slow supply of housing.


THE GASCOIGNE ESTATE REBORN


Council-owned specialist developer Be First explains how the new phase of a major regeneration in Barking, east London is key to a bright future for an estate with a troubled past


HBD_1201_2024_Covers.indd 1


© Paul Riddle go to page 28


07/12/2023 13:51 Update your registration here:


The CMA’s Dan Turnbull commented that the organisation had “heard concerns that the way large housebuilders use land banks and complex planning rules may be harming competition and hold up the building of new homes.”


However the very existence of land banking continues to be refuted by major players within the industry, who instead say that delays at the planning end are to blame for failure to quickly build out sites. The CMA is seeking feedback from “key people in the industry, be that council planning departments, builders or landowners,” beore it publishes its fi nal fi ndings, and it will be intriguing to see how it counters objections.


Someone has to be right, either the large housebuilders are “sitting on land” they could be building on, or they’re not. It’s not an absolute though, if they are allowed to do so then some fi rms may, in these risk-averse times, be loath to build out sites they’re not sure they can sell.


Looking to update or cancel your HBD registration? Scan the QR code to visit our registration page. From here you can also register for our Digital Issues and Newsletters. Alternatively, please visit hbdonline.co.uk/subscribe


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


Another delay which is probably more welcome for some but concering for others is the Future Homes Standard consultation, which has secretly been pushed back to 2024. This will be less than a year before the standard is supposed to come into force. Given that it expects housebuilders to achieve 75+% carbon savings on new builds, and covers virtually every aspect of home construction, the industry needs the standard sooner rather than later if it’s to have a chance of being implemented in 2025.


James Parker


T e manufacturer of the paper used within our publication is a Chain-of-Custody certifi ed supplier operating within environmental systems certifi ed to both ISO 14001 and EMAS in order to ensure sustainable production.


Subscription costs just £24 for 6 issues, including post and packing. Phone 01435 863500 for details. Individual copies of the publication are available at £5 each inc p & p.


All rights reserved.


No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying, recording or stored in any information retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. Although every eff ort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in Housebuilder & Developer, the publisher can accept no responsibility for the claims or opinions made by contributors, manufacturers or advertisers. Editorial contributors to this journal may have made a payment towards the reproduction costs of material used to illustrate their products.


Printed in England.


Publisher Anthony Parker


Managing Editor James Parker


Editorial Assistants Laura Shadwell Shelley Collyer


Studio Manager Mikey Pooley


Production Assistants Georgia Musson Kimberley Musson


Senior Account Manager Sheehan Edmonds


Account Manager Steve Smith


PR Executive Suzanne Easter


Publishing Assistant Kim Neville


Managing Director Simon Reed


Cointronic House, Station Road, Heathfi eld, East Sussex TN21 8DF


Advertising & administration Tel: 01435 863500 info@netmagmedia.co.uk www.hbdonline.co.uk


Editorial features Tel: 01435 863500 jparker@netmagmedia.co.uk


Press releases editorial@netmagmedia.co.uk


In association with:


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84