search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
4


NEWS


Managing Editor James Parker


Publisher Anthony Parker


Account Director Midge Myatt


Senior Account Manager Steve Smith


Digital Marketing & PR Account Manager Suzanne Easter


Operations Director Shelley Collyer


Editorial Contributor Roseanne Field


Events Coordinator Amy Madigan


Studio Manager Mikey Pooley


Production Assistant Georgia Musson


Digital Production Coordinator Kimberley Musson


Feature Coordinator & Publisher’s Assistant Kim Neville


Finance Director Simon Reed


Advertising & Administration 01435 863500


info@netmagmedia.co.uk Press Releases


editorial@netmagmedia.co.uk Registration &


Circulation Enquiries info@netmagmedia.co.uk


FROM THE EDITOR


A


s the Planning and Infrastructure Bill continues to grind its way through Parliament, RIBA is celebrating having secured an amendment to ensure design quality is “at the heart of new development.”


The fact that this is something being celebrate, as a tenet that needs to be enforced by planning legislation, is a bit of an indictment of the state of our building culture in the 21st century. However, it’s necessary, according to RIBA, as the UK rushes towards taking small bites out of a colossal 1.5 million homes target.


The move uses the new Spatial Development Strategies within the Bill as the vehicle for this enforcement, as the legislation will, following RIBA’s amendment, “require SDSs to include a design vision, a clear articulation of what an area or project should be like in the future, developed with the local community and stakeholders.”


RIBA continued with its hyperbole, saying the amendment was “vital for high-quality design to be prioritised in the strategic planning process, and would ensure new development meets the practical needs of residents and communities, while embedding the principles of safety, sustainability and accessibility.” These are bold, potentially optimistic statements. Perhaps more pragmatic is the assertion that RIBA has “secured support for the amendment from the Design Council, the Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists (CIAT) and NLA, and support from Peers across the political spectrum.” So this might mean it has a head of steam in the Lords, but what will its legislative teeth look like? And who will vet that ‘design vision’?


The amendment was tabled by Liberal Dems’ Housing Spokesperson in the Lords, Baroness Thornhill, who RIBA says it’s “working closely with to amplify its call to prioritise high-quality development.” The legislation will hopefully be entering its fi nal stages of debate now Peers have returned from their long summer break.


An Employee Owned Company


Cointronic House Station Road, Heathfi eld East Sussex, TN21 8DF


CIAT President, Eddie Weir, said: “Integrating design visions within SDS gives communities the opportunity to shape local development at an early stage, building support for new homes, amenities, and infrastructure.” Incumbent RIBA President Muyiwa Oki added that without the “requirement for a design vision in the Bill, there is no guarantee that good design will be delivered.”


Annual subscription costs just £48 for 12 issues, including post and packing. Phone 01435 863500 for details. Individual copies of the publication are available at £5 each inc p & p. All rights reserved


No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying, recording or stored in any information retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in Architects Datafi le, the publisher can accept no responsibility for the claims or opinions made by contributors, manufacturers or advertisers. Editorial contributors to this journal may have made a payment towards the reproduction costs of material used to illustrate their products. The manufacturer of the paper used within our publication is a Chain-of-Custody certifi ed supplier operating within environmental systems certifi ed to both ISO 14001 and EMAS in order to ensure sustainable production. Printed in England


This magazine may be recycled


His incoming successor, Chris Williamson, has, rather than trumpet the Bill’s hoped-for ‘guarantee of design quality,’ pointed towards the worrying headwinds for the practice – singling out AI. However, he does believe that architects can “meet the challenges head on,” and “turn them into opportunities.” This, plus issues Williamson pinpoints of mounting fi nancial pressures, I’d suggest, will be the gatekeepers of whether or not the ‘design visions’ survive into reality.


James Parker, Editor


Looking to update or cancel your ADF registration? Scan the QR code to visit our registration page. From here you can also register for our Digital


Issues and Newsletters. Alternatively, please visit architectsdatafi le.co.uk/subscribe


ECLIPSE LEISURE CENTRE, STAINES The UK’s fi rst large-scale Passivhaus leisure centre is a community-focused win by GT3 Architects


ADF_09_2025 Covers.indd 1 04/09/2025 09:38 09.25 ON THE COVER...


Staines’ new Passivhaus leisure centre champions sustainability, accessibility, and strong community-led design.


Cover image © GT3 Architects & Kristen McCluskie


Update your registration here:


For the full report on this project, go to page 32


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


ADF SEPTEMBER 2025


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84