search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
72


LANDSCAPING & EXTERNAL WORKS


Taking a holistic approach to SuDS design allows architects to employ the best solution for the site


These principles are all interlinked, and most SuDS schemes will include a variety of solutions for maximum effect. Taking a holistic approach to SuDS design allows architects to employ the best solution for the site. This means they may choose to use a combination of SuDS devices such as permeable paving, rain gardens, tree pits and blue/green roofs to create a series of small ‘sub catchments.’ This can often better manage the water volume than one device alone, as well as enhancing the quality of the water and contributing to biodiversity. However, that’s not always possible. Permeable paving can be used across projects of all types as a standalone solution for managing water run-off and creating amenity spaces; it also fi lters water by trapping and breaking down harmful pollutants within the stone. This means it supports three out of the four SuDS principles directly.


Permeable paving can also prove to be a good solution if the local planning authority requests that architects provide a ‘betterment’ of SuDS and water management. That’s because the scheme’s hard surfaces, such as asphalt roads,


footpaths, roof space, and car parking, etc, can all be switched to permeable paving relatively easily.


Addressing concerns about costs There’s a misconception that SuDS can be too expensive for all but medium to large projects. Certainly, making late design changes to add SuDS to a scheme will increase project costs. Planning SuDS into the scheme from its inception will not only help with planning compliance, but also help ensure they are more cost-effective than standard drainage; they may not require the extensive excavation, pipework, manhole covers or gullies required etc. Traditional gully drainage systems also require regular cleaning to prevent the drainage system from becoming blocked by debris; otherwise, fl ooding can occur even during normal rainfall. In contrast, maintenance for SuDS schemes can be incorporated into the normal landscaping budget – permeable paving, for example, requires minimal maintenance.


Michael McIvor-New is permeable paving specialist at Tobermore


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


ADF JULY/AUGUST 2026


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78