search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
4


NEWS


Managing Editor James Parker


jparker@netmagmedia.co.uk Publisher


Anthony Parker aparker@netmagmedia.co.uk


Content & Research Coordinator Shelley Collyer


Editorial Assistant & Events Coordinator Laura Shadwell


Studio Manager Mikey Pooley


Production Assistants Georgia Musson Kim Musson


Senior Account Manager Sheehan Edmonds


Account Manager Steve Smith


PR Executive Suzanne Easter


Publishing Assistant Kim Neville


Managing Director Simon Reed


Advertising & Administration t 01435 863500 info@netmagmedia.co.uk www.architectsdatafi le.co.uk


Press Releases


editorial@netmagmedia.co.uk Registration &


Circulation Enquiries info@netmagmedia.co.uk


_Layout 1 17/03/2013 13:19 Page 1


netMAGmedia Ltd Cointronic House Station Road, Heathfi eld East Sussex, TN21 8DF


I


t’s hard not to be completely crestfallen to see the Labour Party bailing on its sustainability investment pledges, not only because of how it points towards us underperforming yet again on net zero. Also, because it shows that the commercial benefi ts of pushing through investment on insulating homes and green energy comes second to the possibility of limiting tax rises in a General Election campaign.


Keir Starmer has done untold damage not only to the green agenda, but also to his own credibility, having said two days before the confi rmation of the Party’s dropping the pledge to put £28bn a year into these crucial endeavours, that he was ‘unwavering’ on the party’s eco aims. He now looks to be a completely watered down shade of green, having given into Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ agenda to make Labour the palatable option for people still in the grip of a cost of living crisis.


With Government coffers now looking increasingly pressured thanks to a range of factors, the £28bn has been halved to less than £15bn, and only a third of that will be new Government investment. Labour’s proposed insulation scheme, which would have seen a national retrofi t initiative like no other, has been diluted from £6bn for 19 million homes in a decade, to a fairly paltry 5 million by 2030.


No surprises that UKGBC has gone ballistic – calling Labour’s climb-down a “colossally short-sighted political manoeuvre.” The organisation said that investing in net zero was the “consensus recommendation of the vast majority of industry, business, and society, but also “central to Labour’s promise to bring down household energy bills.”


netMAG media


publ i shing – ver t i cal search


This had been reported as the one policy pledge that distinguished Labour from the Tories for voters, but now the decision-making process based on actual policy commitments have become muddier, and it’s certainly hard to see the genuine commitment to take the tough steps to get to net zero from Labour based on this announcement. But that’s a short-term concern – the long-term view is that while the UK is on a path to much lower carbon, it is unlikely to ever see net zero if the Government doesn’t take investment seriously, and take voters with them. Trying to blame all of this on Liz Truss’ disastrous budget won’t wash with many people.


Annual subscription costs just £48 for 12 issues, including post and packing. Phone 01435 863500 for details. Individual copies of the publication are available at £5 each inc p & p. All rights reserved


No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying, recording or stored in any information retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in Architects Datafi le, the publisher can accept no responsibility for the claims or opinions made by contributors, manufacturers or advertisers. Editorial contributors to this journal may have made a payment towards the reproduction costs of material used to illustrate their products. The manufacturer of the paper used within our publication is a Chain-of-Custody certifi ed supplier operating within environmental systems certifi ed to both ISO 14001 and EMAS in order to ensure sustainable production. Printed in England


This magazine may be recycled


Young voters are Labour’s bread and butter; what they have done with this massive U-turn on the green agenda is make many of them wonder whether this is truly the party for them in 2024. Those voters really do care about this stuff. The question is, how turned off by sustainability are the majority – the older voting contingent – and is pandering to green-scepticism a price worth paying?


James Parker, Editor


Looking to update or cancel your ADF registration? Scan the QR code to visit our registration page. From here you can also register for our Digital


Issues and Newsletters. Alternatively, please visit architectsdatafi le.co.uk/subscribe


SHREWSBURY FLAXMILL MALTINGS, SHROPSHIRE


FCBStudios’ mammoth restoration of Shrewsbury’s iron-framed ‘grandfather of the skyscraper’ for a sustainable mix of workplace and museum


ADF_02_2024 Covers.indd 1 08/02/2024 14:15 02.24 ON THE COVER...


Update your registration here:


Shrewsbury Flaxmill Maltings, the ‘grandfather of the skyscraper,’ was the world’s fi rst iron-framed building. Feilden Clegg Bradley worked with Historic England to renew it for a sustained mixed use future. Cover image © Daniel Hopkinson For the full report on this project, go to page 32


FROM THE EDITOR


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


ADF FEBRUARY 2024


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84