MY 2 CENTS By Randy Rowles
PAYING FOR THE SINS OF OTHERS
As an industry, we fall victim to the questionable behavior of our brethren pilots and their sometimes-misguided follies. We may not be impacted directly, but
rather in the helicopters form are just of increased
regulatory oversight, increased insurance premiums, and a sense by the public that
unsafe. The
evidence for such a belief is derived from the countless hours of helicopter crash videos found online – not to mention the movies that often use a helicopter crash as the go-to ending for a high-energy chase.
In real life, helicopter accidents often occur due to the pilot flying in an unsafe manner – period. Are there instances where this isn’t the case? Of course, but the hard facts show that many helicopter accidents are avoidable, with the causal factor being the human element.
Safety Management Systems (SMS) specifically address the intent of the pilot’s actions when reviewing a just-culture applicable event. The belief is simply that a reasonable person operating an aircraft would not intentionally act in a manner that harms any person or equipment. However, we know that intentional unsafe actions exist and occur daily. It is the intentional actions of a few that destroy the reputation and potential future existence of the helicopter industry for us all.
At the time of writing this article, I was shown a video of an EC120 hovering within an area of tall palm trees. During the video, the pilot attempts a pedal turn,
10 Sep/Oct 2023
and the tail section impacts a palm tree. In conversations, the issue of the tail strike is the item of discussion. But what of the decision to place the helicopter in a position under the trees in the first place? What would happen if a palm frond fell and impacted the main rotor during flight? As this flight was taking place on a city street, a national media event would have unfolded.
At what point do we as an industry say enough is enough? Why do we agree to keep paying for the acts of the few that are knowingly adversely affecting our livelihood? By agree, I mean not pointing out this behavior to regulators, insurance companies, and the public. We as an industry tend to be silent when such actions occur.
A few months ago, a thread posted by a professional motorcycle rider included a video of a motorcycle doing aerial tricks with a helicopter and drone filming in very close proximity. At one point in the video, the helicopter must abruptly turn away from the motorcycle to avoid hitting the rider with the main rotor blades because the pilot misjudges the future height of the motorcycle after a jump. That video disappeared after a self-proclaimed FAA Inspector made comments on the video thread.
It’s not just amateur pilots who expose our industry to irrational oversight by regulators
and to extreme insurance
prices. Professional pilots with narcissistic tendencies are also to blame. Videos of extreme maneuvering of helicopters
under the protected umbrella of a movie manual are culprits as well. In many cases, the videos have little to do with the actual movie, as no cameras are rolling except for the purpose of social media posts. How many helicopter incidents and accidents have occurred during social media filming versus actual on-set movie events? The answer: quite a few.
And we’re not just talking about aggressive flying. Unapproved landings in areas where common sense should tell a reasonable person that it’s a bad idea occur almost daily. This is often under the banner that no law bans such a landing, so I will land. Most certainly a law will soon exist in response to such behavior. It’s not that unapproved landings are always unsafe. Often the unanticipated noise impact on the community is an issue. As the public begins to research how to deal with helicopter noise, the vast array of helicopter crash videos easily found on an internet search alters their perspective from annoyed to anxious, then from startled to scared, and from acceptance of helicopters to disagreeing with their existence at all costs.
The fact is, we as an industry only have ourselves to blame. We sell anyone with a pulse and high credit score a helicopter, train them to fly it, and expect them to be conservative pilots supporting the greater good of the helicopter industry. Well, that isn’t working. Additionally, some operators provide little-to-no oversight of their pilot staff and seem surprised when an event causes damage or worse: a loss of life by pilot actions that was predictable
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84
