search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Care quality


Relational care:environment, engagement and enterprise


Care expert Jenny Kartupelis MBE discusses the findings of her latest book, Making Relational Care Work for Older People - based on some 150 in-depth interviews over a period of five years – including practical advice for enhancing care outcomes through the physical environment


It is fully accepted that the surroundings in which people live and work in a care home will have a profound effect on their wellbeing. However, fresh approaches to what works and why, are continually unfolding, being tested and developed. My new book published last October, Making Relational Care Work for Older People, offers a conceptual theory based on numerous interviews in seven different care home groups, as well as practical, evidence-based models for environmental changes that benefit residents, managers and staff.1 Over the last five years, I interviewed some 150 older people, care staff and providers of residential homes - as well as community projects - to analyse and better understand what constitutes good practice, and why it matters. This has led to the development of the theory of ‘relational care’ - the idea that a care setting that is effectively a network of


mutual support and acceptance will have the best outcomes.


Changing times


In the past, particularly the first half of the previous century, nursing and care homes were run on lines that allowed them to function primarily as entities where - with some exceptions of course - rules and systems were in place basically to serve the organisation. The dreaded pall of the workhouse still hung over the idea of being ‘put in a home’. More enlightened times brought the change to person-centred care. While there is no universally accepted definition, it does place the emphasis on the older adult as an individual whose wishes and needs should be the guiding principle in care decisions.


That is admirable but there can be an inadvertent downside: a failure to recognise that every individual occupies


a unique place in relation to friends, family, carers, their community and society. While being alone can be a relief at times, humans are born to be interdependent, and very few thrive in situations of isolation or loneliness. Humans are creatures of interaction that need to give as well as receive, to be recognised as having an intrinsic value, rather than as a collection of needs and demands to be met by others. Understanding this leads to favouring the type of care based on relationships. We are looking at the model of a family. Of course, not all families are ideal, and some can be downright dysfunctional. Yet the family that enables its members to feel supported, valued and provides company at, for example, mealtimes - but also honours the need for privacy - is an excellent reference point. During my research, this theory was borne out time and again by the comments of interviewees about what really matters to them.


Principles of relational care One of the underlying principles of relational care is that everyday tasks like personal hygiene, selection of clothes, service of meals - as well as activities like singing, craft or exercise - should be carried out as part of the caring interaction.


Carers told me things like “Someone getting washed and dressed, maybe, that should be an enjoyable, interactive time” and “I join in completely”. One regional manager meanwhile told me “It was hard to break that…task-oriented culture. But that doesn’t provide emotional support to residents...it doesn’t build relationships”. If tasks are ‘blended’ with


conversation and an affectionate touch, older people feel less ‘done to’ and more that they are partners in their own wellbeing. That means more time may have to be allocated to tasks, but possibly less time to crisis management,


34 www.thecarehomeenvironment.com • January 2021


©Hallmark Care Homes


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54