search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Operating theatres


the hospital trialled two different types of modern operating tables. The trial period lasted two weeks and covered both emergency theatres and general surgery, allowing staff to thoroughly assess the functionality and usability of each option in real-world scenarios. “We trialled two different models for two weeks in both emergency theatres and general surgery,” Paul stated. “After this trial, it was decided that one model gave us the same functionality as our existing fleet and was most similar in its usability. The other model was felt to be better for orthopaedic work and exceeded our needs for general surgery.” This thorough evaluation process highlights the importance of involving end-users in the decision-making process when upgrading surgical equipment. By gathering feedback from various departments and considering the specific needs of different surgical specialties, the hospital made an informed choice that would benefit the entire surgical team. The chosen solution offered several key


improvements that addressed the hospital’s specific needs: l A lower working height to improve ergonomic access for surgeons, reducing physical strain during long procedures.


l Anti-collision features to prevent damage to the table or injury, enhancing safety for both patients and staff.


l A longer traversing tabletop which facilitates better access for C-arm procedures, improving imaging capabilities during surgery.


The ability to fit UK rails as standard, allows the hospital to utilise all existing side supports and reduce expenditure, demonstrating a cost- effective approach to modernisation. These features not only improved the functionality of the operating tables but also addressed specific pain points experienced by the surgical teams with the older equipment. Implementing the new operating tables has significantly improved the operational capacity of the surgical departments. Paul also commented on the versatility


of the new tables: “The new tables are now being used in robotic surgery covering gynae, thoracic, ENT and colorectal, and they are also used as general surgery tables throughout the department.” This versatility is particularly valuable in a


busy hospital environment, where the ability to adapt equipment for various surgical specialties can greatly enhance operational efficiency and resource utilisation. The upgrade has notably boosted morale among the surgical teams, alleviating daily pressures and enhancing overall workplace satisfaction. This improvement in


staff satisfaction is a key, often overlooked benefit of equipment modernisation. Happy and comfortable staff are likely to perform better, leading to improved patient outcomes and a more positive work environment. The success of this upgrade has had a ripple effect throughout the hospital. Following the successful trial and subsequent feedback, plans are underway to install additional modern operating tables across more theatres within the hospital, further consolidating the hospital’s capabilities to handle a wider array of surgical procedures, especially in bariatric surgery.


The future of surgical equipment modernisation As healthcare continues to seek innovation, the importance of keeping pace with technological advancements in surgical equipment only increases in importance. Modernising operating tables is just one aspect of a broader trend towards creating smarter, more efficient surgical environments.


Looking ahead, we can expect to see further integration of digital technologies into operating tables and other surgical equipment. This may include features such as real-time data collection and analysis, allowing for more precise patient positioning and improved surgical outcomes. In addition, advancements in materials


science may lead to the development of even more durable and versatile operating tables capable of supporting an even wider range of surgical procedures. Healthcare facilities that invest in modernising their surgical equipment now will be better positioned to adapt to these future advancements. By establishing a culture of continuous


improvement and proactive equipment management, these organisations can ensure they remain at the forefront of surgical care delivery.


About the author


Sam Parry is the Key Accounts Manager at Bender UK and works closely with valued partners to supply the latest operating room technology to NHS and private hospitals across the UK. After three and a half years of working in healthcare sales for Europe, Sam returned to Bender UK last year to support the substantial growth within the UK healthcare sector. He has supplied clinical technology for over 10 years.


CSJ September 2024 I www.clinicalservicesjournal.com 55


References 1. National Health Executive, Outdated equipment being used in 40% of hospitals, new research finds, 20 March 2023. Accessed at: https:// www.nationalhealthexecutive.com/articles/ outdated-equipment-being-used-40-hospitals- new-research-finds


2. Dauber, Martin H; Roth, Steven , Operating Table Failure: Another Hazard of Spine Surgery, Anesthesia & Analgesia 108(3):p 904-905, March 2009. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318195b7a9. Accessed at: https://journals.lww.com/ anesthesia-analgesia/Fulltext/2009/03000/ Operating_Table_Failure__Another_Hazard_of_ Spine.37.aspx


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80