Patient safety
Discrimination stops temp workers speaking up
An investigation has revealed that a culture of fear and discrimination is preventing temporary staff from raising concerns over safety. So how can we strive to address a more open culture of learning, where staff feel safe to speak up?
The latest investigation report from the Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) has revealed there is widespread discrimination against temporary staff in the NHS and this creates a culture of fear that stops them speaking up about patient safety. The findings were identified during an investigation HSSIB were carrying out looking at the integration of temporary staff into healthcare providers. During their investigation, HSSIB heard the
discrimination experienced by temporary workers is due to their work status and sometimes due to their ethnicity. As well as having a negative impact on their wellbeing, HSSIB report states that temporary workers’ experience of discrimination and barriers to speaking up may mean they do not share patient safety concerns, and therefore mitigations to safety risks may not be put in place. Throughout the course of their investigation
HSSIB carried out site visits and engaged with NHS trusts, providers of bank staff, agencies that supply staff to the NHS, substantive (permanent) NHS staff, bank and agency staff, and a range of national stakeholders. Agencies
told HSSIB that because of the culture that can exist within healthcare providers, temporary staff can feel vulnerable about raising concerns. Temporary staff told the investigation that raising concerns can lead to them being seen as a “troublemaker”, potentially resulting in them being “blacklisted” from working at the provider. They also described feeling unwelcome, not part of the team and “disposable” while working in the NHS. They had been told “we don’t need you” when having been deployed and substantive staff sticking together, not providing them with support and, on occasion, not passing on important clinical information or answering questions. The investigation spoke to a number of national organisations and the reports states they ‘all agreed that certain elements of the NHS are currently unable to function safely without the use of temporary staff.’ However, they also heard a common perception from national stakeholders and substantive staff (NHS frontline and senior management) that the knowledge, skills and attitudes of some temporary workers could put patient
safety at risk. Temporary staff and agencies acknowledged that, as with substantive staff, skills, knowledge etc varies and both groups shared concerns that some staff in the NHS made generalisations that temporary staff provided poorer care to patients. During site visits, HSSIB also heard comments suggesting these generalisations were being made across different organisations The report emphasises that staff from ethnic minority backgrounds face known barriers to speaking up, status as a temporary worker then adds an additional challenge to raising concerns. The investigation was told by some that they had experienced discrimination on the grounds of race from both patients and staff members. This was also reflected in the 2023 NHS bank only staff survey results. The investigation observed that some staff accepted such behaviours as the norm saying: “that is just the way it is.” The NHS Race and Health Observatory told
the investigation that workers from ethnic minority backgrounds are less likely to speak up as they are more likely to experience “harsher consequences” if they do. This was also described by the National Guardian’s Office. Both organisations said there was a high number of people from ethnic minority backgrounds employed as temporary workers, which is supported by NHS data. The Race and Health Observatory expressed to HSSIB that temporary staff were seen as “other” due to not being part of the core team. This, coupled with experiencing racist behaviour may mean they do not feel ‘psychologically safe’ to raise concerns. While the investigation found evidence of a negative culture in relation to temporary staff, it also heard of trusts striving to improve relationships. Initiatives included a local temporary staff survey to understand their experience, and a celebration event for bank staff. The investigation also heard from some temporary workers who felt integrated into teams and were viewed as part of the substantive workforce. They had commonly
November 2024 I
www.clinicalservicesjournal.com 77
Monkey Business -
stock.adobe.com
t
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80
