search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Patient safety


Understanding serious transfusion hazards


The latest Annual Report from the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) scheme has been published, once again collecting and analysing anonymised information on serious adverse events and reactions in blood transfusion from all healthcare organisations. Victoria Tuckley and Simon Carter-Graham summarise its key points and recommendations, with the aim of learning lessons and improving patient safety.


The Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) scheme collects and analyses anonymised information relating to serious adverse reactions (SAR) and serious adverse events (SAE) of blood transfusion reported in the United Kingdom (UK). From this data, SHOT makes recommendations to improve patient and transfusion safety. A breakdown of the 2022 Annual SHOT Report1


(assessing a total of 3499


case reports) is shown in Figure 1. In total, 2908/3499 (83.1%) reports were


errors, which continue to account for over 80% of reports submitted each year. Learning from these incidents allow SHOT to identify trends in


NM: Near miss Anti-D: Anti-D


immunoglobulin errors


IBCT: Incorrect blood component transfused


FAHR: Febrile, allergic and hyptotensive reactions


HSE: Handling and storage errors


RBRP: Right blood right patient ADU: Delayed transfusion


TACO: Transfusion-associated circulatory overload


ADU: Avoidable transfusion Non-TACO: Pulmonary


complications of transfusion HTR: Haemolytic


transfusion reactions


ADU: Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC)


CS: Cell salvage ADU: Over or


undertransfusion UCT: Uncommon


complications of transfusion


PTP: Post-transfusion purpura TTI: Transfusion-transmitted


infection


TAGvHD: Transfusion-associated graft-vs-host disease


0


21 20 18 13


1 2


0


Fig 1. Categorisation of reports analysed in 2022. 0


50 50 100 100 150 150 Number 200 200 250 250 300 300 350 350 400 121 52 49 160 272 264 205 296 294


Key SHOT messages l Safe staffing: Clinical and laboratory teams can function optimally only if they are adequately staffed and well resourced. Staffing challenges in both clinical and


1366 345


transfusion safety, develop educational resources and issue recommendations for safer practice. The proportion of errors year on year remains consistent, and taking a holistic approach may help to reduce these. To understand the source of transfusion errors, investigations should look further than the individual, and a system-based approach should be employed.


laboratory areas are commonly cited as contributory in transfusion incidents and must be addressed urgently. Adequate numbers of appropriately trained staff must be available to ensure safe transfusions; there should be contingency planning for staffing levels below a minimum level and for times of high workload.


l Well-resourced systems: Healthcare leaders and management must ensure that staff have access to the correct information technology (IT) equipment which is fit for purpose. Adequate financial resources are a must for safe and effective functioning of teams.


l Addressing knowledge gaps, cognitive biases, and holistic training: Providing transfusion training with a thorough and relevant knowledge base in transfusion to all clinical and laboratory staff along with training in patient safety principles, understanding human factors and quality improvement approaches is essential. It is important that staff understand how cognitive biases contribute to poor decision making so that these can be mitigated appropriately.


l Patient safety culture: Fostering a strong and effective safety culture that is ‘just and learning’ is vital to ensure a reduction in transfusion incidents and errors, thus directly improving patient safety.


Error Not preventable Possibly preventable


l Addressing transfusion delays: Avoidable transfusion delays continue to contribute to patient deaths and measures recommended in the SHOT CAS alert2 to address these.


must be implemented


l Addressing transfusion errors: Errors continue to be the source of most SHOT reports (83.1%). While transfusions are largely safe, errors can result in patient harm. Many of these are caused by poor communication and distraction. These must be investigated


February 2024 I www.clinicalservicesjournal.com 45


t


0


50


100


150


200


250


300


350


400


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68