search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FIRE SAFETY


of the recommendations within the FRA, it is essential and vitally important that a level of priority and importance to these recommendations is afforded within the relevant management system. Action must be taken immediately if there is catastrophic risk, or if risks can be reduced by simple immediate action.


‘As low as reasonably practicable’ (‘ALARP’) Emphasis on the legal requirement to reduce the risk to ‘as low as reasonably practicable’, i.e. the point at which the benefits of risk reduction become grossly disproportionate to the cost. This will vary, as the risk varies, and includes not only financial cost, but equally cost in terms of reductions in the ability to provide treatment or care for patients.


Proportionality An area in which all persons can easily and quickly evacuate will have a different risk profile to one in which the act of moving very highly dependent patients may endanger their lives. In the case of the latter, the benefits are likely to be far higher than in the former, and thus the point at which the costs become ‘disproportionate to the risk’. It is this which the FSO differentiates at the start of many of the Articles by including e.g. “17.-(1): ‘Where necessary in order to safeguard the safety of relevant persons”. This means that there may be variations in, for example: a) The acceptable standard of fire doors. b) Maintenance regimes – both in frequency and applicable standards.


c) The provision of fire extinguishing media. d) The level of training. e) The frequency and type of evacuation exercise. f) Any such variation should be supported by, and


detailed in, a fire safety protocol (HTM 05-01 Appendix E) or training needs analysis (HTM 05-03 Part A).


Competence There are many reading this article who will be fire risk assessors. As is clear from the aforementioned bullet points, complex healthcare premises are very different from a typical factory, office, or shop, and more complex than even a high-risk residential building. FRAs may be undertaken by both (or either) internally


A patient-initiated ‘malicious’ fire.


April 2025 Health Estate Journal 45


Courtesy of Anthony Pitcher, NHS Wales


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68