TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT M&R Assessing SPOTLIGHT ON
GREG MARKHAM BEng (Hons), CEng, FIHEEM, MIET, MIWFM, Membership and Registration Committee
T
he Membership and Registration Committee (M&R) exists to manage membership applications on behalf of IHEEM, potential registrations with the Engineering Council (ECUK) as EngTech, IEng, and
CEng, plus the Authorising Engineer registers. It consists of a small but dedicated team of volunteers, ably supported and facilitated by the Head Office team, particularly Karen Casey and Clair Wilkins. I first became involved in the M&R Committee in the late 1990s, having recently become registered as a
Chartered Engineer through the Institute. The then Membership Manager, Tammy Simmons, ‘invited’ me to become part of the Committee, I think the conversation went along the lines of ‘You will join the M&R won’t you..?’. As a recent registrant she was keen for me to appreciate how the Committee facilitated that journey, and to act as a catalyst for some overdue change. Back then, everything was done in person, 2-3 times per year, and applications took many months to process. Today, the M&R Committee
operates in a significantly different way and far more efficiently, with the experience of the potential member/registrant always central to the focus of the meetings. Most meetings are now ‘virtual’, and all applications are reviewed prior to the meeting by three reviewers (plus an additional audit in selected cases), and membership can be awarded on consensus. Only non-consensus applications are reviewed by the full committee, along with all applications for potential registration with ECUK. The purpose and focus has moved from ‘enforcing’ the standards to ‘upholding’ them, acting as a point of peer review, as opposed to a barrier or ‘test’ to membership and/or registration. Copious notes and records are kept throughout each stage of the process to ensure transparency and fairness in all decisions, and to ensure that all applications are assessed on their merits, with a view to encouraging applications and assisting all in attaining membership and/or registration. This also extends to the registration with ECUK to ensure rigorous peer review, without creating barriers. Much focus is placed on the review of Engineering Practice Reports ahead of any potential call to interview, to ensure that all potential registrants are provided with the best opportunity to present their career experiences for peer review against the ECUK competencies. This has recently culminated in a training day which I was asked to facilitate, for all Engineering
Copious notes and records are kept throughout each stage of the process
Council Assessors and potential Assessors, to try and drive further improvement and consistency. In the spirit of peer review, this was designed as an interactive session, with guidance provided and full participation of all delegates to share their experiences, understanding, and queries. Feedback has been very positive, and we hope to repeat this session for more potential Assessors, as we need to diversify our cohort to better reflect our membership and potential membership.
Over the past 25 years of involvement with M&R, and as an Assessor, I continue to learn much, and I can honestly say that I get far more out of the experience than the time and effort that I put in. Whether it’s debating applications, assessing potential registrations, interviewing candidates for registration, or mentoring applicants through their registration journey, it has helped me widen my perspective on healthcare engineering, and helped me keep in touch with those progressing through, who will be our future leaders of the profession. The work of M&R continues, and we will continue to strive to improve the experience of potential members and registrants. If this might
be of interest to you, please contact the Head Office team and let them know. There are many opportunities to provide new members with support and mentoring to develop their careers, and in turn develop the collective capability of our healthcare engineering and estates profession to the benefit of all stakeholders, not least our patients in the future.
16 Health Estate Journal April 2024
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68
