search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WELF ▶▶▶ARE Figure 1 - Measuring emotions in farm animals – sensor approaches. MEASURING EMOTIONS IN FARM ANIMALS – SENSOR APPROACHES Neutral emotional state Biochemical factors Oxytocin


E-MOTION =


Positive emotional state Visible Indicators Ear Postures, Tail Positions, Eye White Region, Orbital tightening, nose or cheek bulge


ENERGY IN MOTION


Negative emotional state


Cortisol Dopamine Corticosterone MiRNA


Sensor measures


EEG-Brain Waves Respiration Rate Blood Volume Pulse Acoustics and Noise


Heart Rate Thermal / Heat Smell / Olfactory


Facial recognition platform


Wearable sensors


Importantly, such detection is being performed humanely without animals being aware and provides an unfettered result in real time without any probes being surgically inserted. The benefit of this is early detection of any illness or disease so that treatment or confinement is swiftly provided. Considerably re- ducing, if not eliminating, any contagious ailment from being spread throughout a farm also protects valuable livestock. WUR Wolf identifies animal emotions based on four principal facial expressions – neutral, aggression, happiness and fear. To build a database, the test sample of pigs was used to de- termine the correct algorithm. A number of artificial intelli- gence (AI) algorithms and camera and infrared imaging sys- tems were used to gather data, such as eye retinal detection and the complex simulation of a neural network, to produce an automated emotion evaluation from what might be called a thinking computer. Such technology has previously been used for human aids to produce interactive robots, in the ad- vertising industry to determine consumer preferences, and as an education tool, to name a few.


Difficulties ahead The quantum leap to apply such technology to animals is in its infancy. This early scientific work basically breaks down an animal’s emotions into positive and negative. The areas of fuzzy logic, baselines and stress defined by species are still largely unexplored. The ability to produce a framework on how animals feel must take the areas of affected emotion, feelings and mood into account.


12 ▶ PIG PROGRESS | Volume 37, No. 2, 2021


To define the complexity of these areas, affected emotion is a reaction to an initial stimulus, whereas feelings span short or longer times while mood occurs in the background and makes an emotion either positive or negative overall. Over 65 emotions have been attributed to humans, but as already mentioned, our ease of communication makes that complex task much less onerous. How many emotions animals have is the crux of the ongoing study. The input of data includes such things as the appear- ance of eyes, ear position/posture, age, orbital cheek or snout tightening, nose bulge, eyelid movement and the animal’s body and tail postures that a computer programme will need to mull over before giving an analysis of emotion. Further refinement of programmes like WUR Wolf show promise in identifying stress in farm animals. In the mean- time, efforts are underway to develop an economical and us- er-friendly sensing platform for emotional check-up of farm animals. Farmers possessing this tool would provide better management through continuous computer monitoring that would lead to illnesses being identified and treated quicker which, in turn, would increase production levels to make a business more profitable. The old saying that a content cow is a happy cow could possibly never be truer with facial recog- nition technology. Farmers and business owners would also be grinning with such an animal emotional health tool.


References available upon request. The author can be reached at suresh.neethirajan@wur.nl.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60