THOUGHT LEADER The Unfortunate Answer is ‘No’ Written By Richard Fischer M

y, how things in pupil transportation have changed over the last two years. Would you have imagined school bus drivers taking sack lunches to kids, parking school buses

with Wi-Fi, so that kids could use the school supplied com- puters, or buses transporting only 11 students per route? On the other hand, much has not changed the past

50 years. Pupil transportation professionals consistently state that their primary mission is to provide the safest transportation of students to and from school. Now, we have exterior cameras on buses, so we can

document incidents of drivers running the flashing red lights. But what have we really gained? Are you aware that the school bus kills more children than passing mo- torists? We are able to provide the courts and police with evidence, but even in instances where counties have instituted a fine for the infraction, the town receives 10 percent of the revenues and the county receives 90 per- cent, as is the case in Suffolk County, New York. Cameras on the bus make money for towns, municipalities and for camera contractors, but do they make kids safer? The unfortunate answer is no. Since 1970, national statistics compiled by the Kansas State Department of Education’s Transportation Section consis- tently report increasing numbers of children and pedestrians killed or injured outside the bus. As a side note, these “official” numbers are derived from voluntary state self-reporting. Although statistics from the most recent years are not yet officially compiled, the numbers of incidents reported on the news wires and online articles are grim. For the last three years, 43 children were killed and

175 were injured by or around their own school bus and passing drivers, according to data I have compiled.

2018-2019: 2019-2020: 2020-2021:

16 killed, 69 injured 18 Killed, 79 injured 9 killed, 27 injured

Significantly, for two of these three years there were

fewer schools open, fewer students transported and fewer buses on the roads. The majority of student fatal- ities and injuries occur during loading and unloading. Yet children, some as young as 5 years old, are required to cross multi-lane roads to reach their buses because a right-hand stop is not “convenient.” Now what about those cameras? Are there fewer drivers passing school bus red lights? Perhaps, but that data is only

28 School Transportation News • JULY 2021

anecdotal. Perhaps more drivers are being fined, but statis- tics show that the cameras haven’t made the children safer. Children, especially the youngest ones, do not possess

the ability to judge a vehicle’s size, distance or speed, making them especially vulnerable in traffic (“Children in Traffic” American Automobile Association video.) Since 1930, only one state—California—requires the school bus driver to cross students at a stop and has had no fatalities or injuries at bus stops. Meanwhile, 49 other states pile up reasons why they can’t accomplish the same thing.

During these same three years, 2019 through half of 2021, 45 children were left on empty buses. In eight in- stances, the bus had both a driver and an aide on board. In one case, there were two aides. In a separate incident, a driver and two aides left a wheelchair-bound student, twice. Are you outraged or at least uncomfortable yet? Given the lack of corrective action taken over many years, maybe the unfortunate answer is no. During these same three years, there were 57 bus fires. One student and driver died, and the industry saw at least 273 rear-end collisions resulting in 20 fatalities to passengers of vehicles that under rode the bus. There were 320 injuries on the school bus. Given these statistics and the primary stated mission

of the industry, today the most important issue seems to be the replacement of diesel buses with electric. Why? Is it because it is easier to sit back and accept “free” federal money than to tackle the long-standing safety issues in the industry? Of all the currently proposed legislation to invest billions of dollars in electric buses, the major- ity of money will go to mass transit not school buses. A child on an electric bus is not safer if issues surrounding placement of school bus stops, safer routing and more comprehensive driver training are not implemented. The primary mission of the pupil transportation

industry is the safe transport of children to and from school. Is the child on an electric bus safer? The unfortu- nate answer is no. ●

Richard “Dick” Fischer is the owner of Trans-Consult World-Wide Consult Service. He has logged 64 years in pupil transportation as a director of transportation, driver trainer and publisher. In 1972, he successfully petitioned President Richard Nixon to establish the first National School Bus Safety week. Subscribe to his free school bus safety newsletter by emailing

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52