search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE MEASURE OF INDIANS E


BY ALEXANDER EWEN AND IVANA MARAVIC


THE LARGEST SCIENTIFIC STUDY IN THE WORLD, NAMELY THE U.S. CENSUS, HAS ALWAYS HAD DIFFICULTY DEALING WITH AMERICAN INDIANS.


xcluded from the 10-year count until 1890, many tribal mem- bers have regarded this federal government intrusion with great suspicion. Compounded by ques-


tionable attitudes in the census leadership, the result was a severe undercount of the Native population through the mid-20th


century. Yet


federal programs rely on census figures for spending decisions, an important reason that Indian Country is so often short-changed. In recent years, the census has tried to


make amends. Its efforts to count more ac- curately led to a statistical “population explo- sion” of American Indians from 1970 to 1990, and the work continues. Over the past few years, the Census Depart-


ment has been considering new changes in the questions it asks about race and ethnicity. The department periodically alters these questions to keep up with shifts in the social fabric of the nation. It has become concerned either that its current categories do not fully reflect the backgrounds of the American people or that the questions are too confusing for people to answer. In the 2010 census, more than 19 mil- lion people could not give their background but chose the category, “some other race.”


54 AMERICAN INDIAN SUMMER/FALL 2014 The importance of the census data and its


many political ramifications make accuracy vital to understanding the social, economic and political well-being of the country’s vari- ous peoples. Yet for Native Americans, the is- sue is sensitive because “Native American” or “American Indian” is in itself a catchall catego- ry. It does not reflect the tremendous diversity of the Native cultures of this hemisphere. This complexity and the distinct political and so- cial issues that have faced Indians over the past century have made it particularly difficult for the Census Department to gather and report data. For much of the 20th


century the census


was viewed, as were many other government programs, with suspicion by many Indians, who were fighting to protect their rights and lands, often from the very same government. We recently published a study in Indian


Country Today, “How to Make the Census Count for Natives,” that detailed the difficul- ties the Census Department has faced. Up until 1890, most Indians were excluded from


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100