search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PLANT MANAGEMENT


MDEVELOPMENTS IN


that is often overlooked is marshalling of electrical signals, but this is where huge improvements to operations and maintenance, and ultimately the bottom line, can be made. Marshalling can be defi ned as the


P


grouping of inputs and outputs (I/O). It enables diverse operating systems to interact, and it encompasses a wide range of requirements: including intrinsic safety (IS) isolation, signal conditioning, relay interfaces, surge protection and cable terminations, often including loop disconnects. However, marshalling is also a neglected area of system design that has historically lacked an overall


rocessing plants worldwide are under increased pressure to operate more effi ciently and make cost savings. One area


vision for future development. T is is a challenge that Eaton, as an expert in reliability, effi ciency and safety of electrical products, has been keen to address.


MARSHALLING CHALLENGES It can be a real challenge for process engineers to know what their exact marshalling requirements may be in a few years’ time: because the site grows, projects evolve and customer priorities change. Marshalling system fl exibility is therefore paramount to prevent delays from changes (and associated cost increases) in project specifi cation. Traditionally there may be up to


fi ve separate cabinets for the diff erent marshalling functions, with complex wiring between the marshalling


Roger Highton explains how a pioneering approach to marshalling can deliver big benefi ts in complex processing applications


ARSHALLING


components: up to eight interconnections per channel. T is creates a complex wiring structure and is a major source of faults and downtime. Another major source of complexity is multiple components from multiple suppliers. A traditional marshalling solution with IS typically involves 20 diff erent component types. During later design stages the component type often needs to be amended, which results in changes to the Bill of Materials that are long and complex. Additionally, late changes make it diffi cult for end users to maintain the marshalling system and control lifetime costs. Space requirements are also a key challenge – particularly in oil & gas processing – and marshalling systems can become increasingly unwieldy as


Marshalling of electrical signals needs an overall vision to enable it to keep pace with the challenges of modern processing environments


www.engineerlive.com 31


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68