PLANT MANAGEMENT
supported by the original supplier, spare parts may no longer be readily available and system performance issues may begin to appear. With some DCS systems now decades old, system users often know they need to upgrade but find the task daunting given the cost and potential for disruption of operations while the new system is brought online. Even if process manufactures have installed newer equipment alongside legacy components, there can be considerable challenges maintaining disparate legacy systems, associated spare parts and the different skill sets required to support multiple control system platforms. Tis can lead to “islands of automation” that diminish the effectiveness of a user to integrate, control and optimise the entire process from beginning to end. It may be that the system user has simply outgrown the existing control system due to increased production demands and/or newly added processes. “Most process manufacturers are looking to maximise their automation investments and run them as long as they can before upgrading or replacing,” explains Dwight Wood from NovaTech, whose D/3 DCS system solution was introduced 38 years ago as the first hybrid batch and continuous control architecture. “A number of process manufacturers have come to us with I/O, controllers and even servers that are 30 to 40 years old.” When process manufacturers ultimately decide to move forward on an upgrade, however, they often find that their DCS supplier has implemented a new generation of technology that lacks a cost and mission effective migration path to update the existing system often requiring a rewrite of applications programming or a complete “rip and replace.” Fortunately, ripping and replacing a dead- ended DCS system is not required. “Addressing the vulnerabilities that are
present with a legacy DCS does not always require a disruptive, all-at-once approach,”
26
www.engineerlive.com
UPGRADING AGEING DCS A
Addressing gaps, potential risks and islands of automation on a staged basis minimises costly disruptions to operations and provides greater flexibility as equipment and data needs evolve over time
s distributed control systems (DCS) age, there can be increasing risks to the process manufacturer. An old or obsolete DCS system may no longer be
says Wood. “For a plant of any scale running at or near capacity, taking down processing lines for any amount of time can be extremely expensive in terms of lost production and business impact.” Instead, many engineering, operations
and procurement teams are opting for a multi-stage implementation over a total system overhaul by phasing in newer DCS servers, controllers and applications. Tis approach is more affordable and less disruptive, while still allowing gaps, points of pain and cybersecurity risks to be addressed immediately.
A MULTI-STAGE APPROACH Te process typically begins with a consultation and “deep dive” into the current system and application, says Wood. “We begin the process diagnostically to identify the pain points, gaps, operating challenges, and any other potential risks in the current process and control system implementation. Tis supports a more targeted approach that focuses on areas of improvement that can bring the greatest impact in terms of operations and addressing risk exposure.” A multi-stage migration approach can often begin by integrating new DCS components with new and existing I/O devices. As I/O is one of the most significant investments in an automation upgrade, I/O drops can be replaced in a phased manner over time allowing for spare parts capture from decommissioned drops, phased implementation aligned with plant outage limitations and staggered financial investment.
Another consideration is the need to integrate the DCS system with the existing enterprise systems. “Customers want more than an effective implementation of the Level 2 automation system,” says Wood. “Tey often want improved data capture and the conversion of that data into useful knowledge presented in desktop KPI dashboards that can be used at the manufacturing execution level and/or the
NovaTech’s PCM 400 system enterprise ERP level.”
THE USER INTERFACE A DCS system is a hub of a processor’s operations monitoring key variables such as flow, applied temperatures, pressure, level and material conveying/handling. Te operator user interface brings all the data that is collected from production equipment and the controllers process and presents it
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68
