RENEWABLE ENERGY
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER Lessons learnt from tidal energy tripod decommissioning shared A
n innovative, collaborative decommissioning project at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) has completed the
forensic analysis of a tidal energy tripod. T e study gained a comprehensive understanding of the end-of-life condition of the tripod, assessing the long-term eff ect of deploying components and systems in the challenging high velocity environment at EMEC’s Fall of Warness tidal energy test site. T e tripod had been submerged for approximately 11 years during which two tidal turbines had operated on it. Signifi cant learnings have been collated
and two reports published to provide feedback and design guidelines to the off shore renewable energy industry, enabling developers to minimise decommissioning costs and de-risk future projects. John Skuse, operations and maintenance manager from EMEC said: “Decommissioning is a critical part of the lifecycle of ocean energy projects, however it’s not yet well explored, as relatively few ocean energy technologies have progressed to the decommissioning stage following long-term deployment. “It is imperative that decommissioning is managed carefully, including design stages, installation, performance, right through to decommissioning. As the industry continues to develop and mature, the ability to decommission devices effi ciently and cleanly will be instrumental in ensuring site utilisation is maximised.” EMEC contracted Orkney-based marine operations provider, Leask Marine,
to remove the tripod foundation from the Fall of Warness test site. T e project required continuous innovation by the Leask Marine team during the cutting and retrieval operations. Standard industry equipment used in off shore subsea oil and gas would have been unable to withhold the strong currents. Leask Marine’s engineering team therefore designed and fabricated a new robust cutting tool support frame to hold the tool in place on the pile with suffi cient grip to control the turbulent drag forces. T e specifi cally designed frame had a
buoyancy system added to help lift the 140-ton structure from the seabed in one operation. Leask Marine’s vessel then towed the frame and tripod to Hatston Pier in Kirkwall for forensic analysis, fi nal cutting and disposal of parts.
FORENSIC ANALYSIS Forensic analysis was carried out by Blackfi sh Engineering Design, the International Centre for Island Technology (ICIT) at Herriot Watt University, Rovco, Brunel Experimental Techniques Centre, and Brunel Centre for Advanced Solidifi cation Technology. Forensic examination activities assessed biofouling, corrosion, metallurgic (metal) defects and electrical connector longevity. T e study found that all surfaces exposed to seawater current will be subjected to vigorous fouling. Components that are expected to move, slide, or require clearance in any way must be designed assuming that biofouling will occur on all steel
surfaces. Components that are installed for long-term submersion should be designed to account for biofouling end stage communities up to 15cm thick and the additional weight should be factored into lifting operations during decommissioning. Biofouling was markedly reduced where larvae access to surfaces was restricted due to a lack of fl ow and a lack of nutrient supply. Stainless steel 316L, titanium and super duplex material have all shown excellent resistance to corrosion, but all of them are susceptible to biofouling. T e study was part of the EMEC-led FORESEA project, funded by Interreg North-West Europe. Tim Warren, Engineering Director,
Blackfi sh, said: “T is decommissioning project has provided really valuable data for engineering designers and project developers of off shore renewable devices. A detailed examination of the biofouling, corrosion and performance of diff erent structures, materials and coatings has provided a great insight into the long term performance of submerged components and how the design can be improved to ensure longevity and performance for their entire lifetime. “By publishing this project and the lessons learned to the wider off shore renewables industry, it is hoped that future devices will benefi t from this by reducing costs and improving decommissioning operations.”
34
www.engineerlive.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52