search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MATERIALS • PROCESSES • FINISHES


prioritised and progressed according to timeframe. Product development and project managers tend to focus on ensuring that all the required components are available by a certain date. In the worst cases, only once the components have arrived do engineers start worrying about how, and indeed whether, these components will fit together.


Te number of tolerance and assembly issues identified at this stage is higher than many would care to admit. Fixturing can also cause problems, because investment in adequate work-holding equipment when adding remaining components is often the first to go in the drive to reduce


project costs. Tis is, of course, a false economy: awkward working processes caused by incorrect fixturing can result in both damage to, and sub-standard assembly of, the prototype.


A SOLUTION TO THE PROTOTYPE PROBLEM It’s clear that prototype development needs a new approach. By focusing on wider objectives of getting a product to market and into production, the solution is challenging but achievable. Each step in the prototype manufacture and assembly process must be driven by the objectives of final


production. Overall risk, cost and time can be reduced, while increasing the chances of accurate production, reducing final assembly time and lowering the cost of re-work.


A NOVEL APPROACH Production-oriented prototyping (POP) is a novel approach to prototype development that involves both the individual component and full assembly designers from the start of the application development phase. Te aim is to build production standards into the prototype, while minimising cost and delivery time, as well as optimising safety.


www.engineerlive.com 53


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76