Proteomics, Genomics & Microarrays
Avoiding DNA adsorption to tube walls in NGS sample preparation Emily Flowers, Hanna Oldfi eld, Gerrit Gutzke, Steve Knight*, Azenta Life Sciences
Polypropylene (PP) is the ideal plastic material for (q)PCR tubes as PP is chemically inert, resistant to solvents and is well suited to injection moulding, allowing for (q)PCR tubes to be produced with very thin walls for fast heat transfer and therefore optimum (q)PCR results. Despite the very hydrophobic nature of PP, DNA has been shown to bind to PP tubes, especially in high ionic conditions [1]. Different PP polymers can be used for producing PCR consumables, each of which have different characteristics [3], and several manufacturers have introduced low binding products to their ranges to reduce DNA binding [2]. A particularly important characteristic of PP polymers is the surface charge, which infl uences binding of DNA in varying amounts.
Binding of DNA to PP is typically not an issue for (q)PCR as during amplifi cation, any DNA stuck to the walls of the tube is released during the denaturation step, maintaining accessibility of the DNA for the reaction. This is, however, becoming more of an issue due to the progressing miniaturisation of reaction volumes and the development of new technologies such as Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). These techniques often use very small amounts of DNA and have several incubation and transfer steps, therefore they require ultralow DNA binding consumables to ensure specifi city and consistency of the reaction.
Methods Transfer steps:
10-fold serial dilutions of digested plasmid ACTA1 (1167bp) from 0.01ng/µl to 10ng/µl were incubated in 96 well PCR plates made from one of the standard in-house PP polymers (Azenta), low binding PP polymer (Azenta) and low binding PP polymer from competitor E. ACTA1 fragments were incubated for 30minutes at room temperature before transferring to the next well for a total of 8, 30 minute incubations (240 minutes total). 2µl samples from each concentration both before and after incubation were run in qPCR (SYBR Fast qPCR kit, KAPA) and Ct values compared.
Figure 2: Difference in Ct value seen after incubation of a 1.1kb linear DNA fragment at 37°C with PP tubes made from different polymers. Data created by BioMimOx (UK).
Incubation temperature:
Incubation temperature has no signifi cant impact on DNA binding. Repeating the above described experiments with Azenta Life Sciences low binding PP polymer and mouse genomic DNA at 4°C, 37°C and 65°C showed no signifi cant loss of DNA.
Figure 1: Schematic of DNA template incubation steps.
Incubation temperature: The above experiment was then carried out using mouse genomic DNA (Clontech) on the PCR plate made from low binding PP polymer (Azenta). DNA was incubated at a broad range of different temperatures to simulate the expected loss at different stages of the reaction cycle. Temperatures tested were 4°C for sample storage, 37°C for enzymatic reaction and 65°C for enzyme denaturation. Samples pre and post- incubation were then run in qPCR (SYBR Fast qPCR kit, KAPA) and the change in Ct values of the samples assessed.
Results Transfer steps:
On comparison with low binding products from other vendors, serial incubation of a 1.1kb linear DNA fragment showed no signifi cant loss of DNA in Azenta low binding plates, while some loss was seen from low starting concentrations in plates made of alternative materials or competitor low binding branded plates, resulting in signifi cantly higher Ct values (up to 3 cycles).
Figure 3: Difference in Ct value seen after incubation of mouse genomic DNA with Azenta low bind PP polymer at 4°C, 37°C and 65°C. Data created by Nippon Genetics Co. Ltd. (Japan)
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48
