search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
vi Air Monitoring - UK Focus


Climate Change Control: Going Above and Beyond CO2


Up until now, global and domestic efforts to curb climate change have largely focused on reducing


the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere. While this is still a vital aspect of managing climate change, there is increasing acceptance that more can be achieved in the shorter-term by targeting black carbon.


Enviro Technology is now supplying the PAX system, the world’s most advanced black carbon monitoring equipment.


Black carbon affects the climate by intercepting and absorbing sunlight, darkening snow and ice when deposited and helping to form clouds. When the dark particles of black carbon absorb sunlight, either in the air or when they accumulate on snow and ice, they increase radiative forcing, which is the effect it has on the balance of incoming and outgoing energy in the atmosphere and the main concept behind global warming. It is most noticeable at the poles, on glaciers and in mountain regions – all environments which are, unfortunately, showing the greatest impact of climate change.


Emitted during incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and biomass, some of the main culprits for the creation of black carbon are: brick kilns, wood-burning stoves and diesel engines.


While the full impact of black carbon is still being assessed, it is linked to the melting of the glaciers in the Himalayas, disruption of traditional rainfall patterns in India and Africa and low yields of cereal crops such as: maize, rice, wheat and soya bean crops in Asia and elsewhere. It also has a significant effect on human health as it can be inhaled deeply into the lungs, where it causes cardiovascular disease and lung cancer.


According to a United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report published last year, ground-level ozone and black carbon together could be reducing crop yields by as much as 50m tonnes per year and leading to 2.5m premature deaths per year.


Climate change ‘quick win’


The fact that black carbon has a relatively short atmospheric life-span of up to just a few weeks is a critical factor in the worldwide fight to


combat climate change. CO2 can stay in the atmosphere for centuries and means that efforts to reduce emissions will take a very long time to be effective. Measures to reduce black carbon levels are therefore a much ‘quicker win’ and have a faster impact on global warming levels.


Monitoring black carbon levels


In recognition of the importance of black carbon as a major climate change ‘quick win’ UNEP has embarked on a global collaborative initiative to mitigate global warming by monitoring and targeting black carbon levels. It is now more important than ever that black carbon particles are measured accurately and effectively.


Author Details: Duncan Mounsor,


Sales and Marketing Director, Enviro Technology


Email: duncan.mounsor@et.co.uk Tel: 01453 733 200 Web: www.et.co.uk


There are two technologies available for the measurement of black carbon using optical absorption – namely filter methods and photoacoustic technology.


Filters have been used to measure black carbon concentrations for several decades and they have provided the foundation for the science world’s basic understanding of the distribution of black carbon in time and space. The basic principle behind the measurement is that the amount of light attenuated by the combination of the filter and the deposited sample can be related to the mass of black carbon sampled. It is a relatively simple measurement to make, which is one of its biggest


IET November / December 2012 www.envirotech-online.com


advantages and because a high volume of air can be sampled through the filter, the technique can be quite sensitive.


However, according to Gavin McMeeking, a Scientist at US-based Droplet Measurement Technologies, the filter method has its disadvantages. He explains: “One of the major downsides to sampling onto a filter is that you have to measure light attenuation - light is absorbed by particles (the signal), but also scattered by particles and the filter fibres - and you have to assume a relationship to convert the light attenuation to light absorption or black carbon mass.


“There is also the potential for the properties of the light-absorbing particles to change once they are embedded in the filter. They can absorb additional light that is scattered by the filter itself, or other particles embedded in the filter, or can change due to the addition or removal of material by air as it passes through the filter. There are several correction routines that can be applied when post-processing the data, but each requires assumptions or additional measurements of other particulate matter properties and introduce uncertainties. Worse, there is evidence that for some conditions, such as when there are high organic aerosol loadings or there are changes in relative humidity, the accepted corrections still do not provide an accurate result.”


Newer techniques avoid most of these problems by eliminating the filter. The photoacoustic approach used by the photoacoustic extinctiometer (PAX) instrument measures absorption of the particulate sample directly in air. It does this by measuring the pressure wave caused by the heating of the air surrounding a light absorbing particle when it is illuminated by a laser of the wavelength absorbed by the particle. The amplitude of the pressure wave is proportional to the light absorbed by the particles.


Since the particles are not embedded in a filter and absorption is measured directly, the photoacoustic technique avoids the artefacts affecting the filter-based measurement methods. For this reason, photoacoustic instruments have been used to validate filter-based measurements in a number of field and laboratory studies. Photoacoustic instruments also have the advantage of being able to be calibrated using absorbing particles or gases, depending on the wavelength of the measurement, which gives the method a physical grounding.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60