search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology


963


Fig. 1. A framework using ‘risky behaviors’ observed during simulations to identify environmental strategies to support safe doffing of Ebola-level personal protective equipment.


Finally, some risky behaviors were the result of incompatibility


between the physical environment and the adopted protocol. Some HCWs tried to read the instructions from the wall-mounted poster instead of listening to the TO’s instructions, which resulted in desynchronization of the HCW and TO during doffing. Similarly, at site D, the HCW was responsible for establishing a chemical mat by laying out 4–6 wipes on the floor (Figure 2A). Without guidance, the HCW occasionally created the mat too far from the hand sanitizer or trash bin to be easily reached.


DISCUSSION


From a review of published literature on the risk of self- contamination while doffing PPE, observation of the simulations, feedback from study participants at all 4 sites, and analysis of the layouts of the Ebola treatment centers, we identified 5 require- ments the doffing area should accomplish to increase process safety (Figure 3), as detailed below.


Facilitate Communication Between HCWs and TOs


Communication challenges were associated with failure to clean some items and with either omitting steps or performing steps out of order. Because doffing requires precise attention to detail and occurs when the HCW is potentially fatigued and stressed, a TO supervises and reads out the steps of the doffing proce- dure.21 The TO and doffing HCW need (1) to be able to see


each other, (2) to be able to obtain each other’s attention easily, and (3) to be able to communicate complex instructions while the HCW is wearing complex PPE that usually includes a powered air purifying respirator (PAPR), which can limit both hearing and vision. The TO must also be able to see the HCW from head to toe to visualize any breaches in PPE or potential contamination. Good communication can be facilitated by spatial designs that


increase visual and auditory connections between the TO and HCW. The design of the physical space, such as the location and size of windows and doors, influences the ability of HCWs to communicate with TOs.13 Communication is easier if the TO and HCW are in the same space; collocation can also make it easier for the TO to see the HCW from head to toe. Good visibility between the TO and the HCW can be achieved even if the 2 are stationed in separate rooms through the thoughtful placement of the doffing area and positioning of the TO. Windows, without obstructions, need to be adequately sized, and the doffing area must be sufficiently distant from the window so that the TO can see the HCW’s feet. Other communication improvement strategies include the use of


headsets or intercoms. Headsets can be used inside the PPE to help overcome noise generated by the PAPR.13 Alternatively, audio speakers in the patient room can amplify the voice of the TO, but this approach may be disruptive to patients.22 Study participants stated that they used white boards to communicate messages during patient care and doffing, but this was not observed during


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140