search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology


Table 1. Multivariable Logistic Regression Models of Factors Associated With Common Prescribing Errors


Model Variable


Bivariate Analysis OR (95% CI)


Adjusted Analysis OR (95% CI)


Factors associated with prescription of antibiotic for sinusitis when not indicated


Physician (vs advanced practice provider)


Urgent care/ED site of visit (vs outpatient clinic)


Cough Purulent nasal discharge


Prescription of nonantibiotic adjuvant therapy


Physician (vs advanced practice provider)


Urgent care/ED site of visit (vs outpatient clinic)


Diabetes mellitus Asthma


Prescription of nonantibiotic adjuvant therapy


Prescription of azithromycin


Physician (vs advanced practice provider)


Urgent care/ED site of visit (vs outpatient clinic)


Weight (kilograms) Prescription of amoxicillin 2.1 (1.0–4.2)


1.8 (0.6–5.2) 0.3 (0.1–0.6)a 1.5 (0.7–3.1)a


0.8 (0.4–1.7) 1.8 (0.8–4.2)


3.7 (1.0–13.3) 0.2 (0.1–0.5) 2.6 (1.1–6.4)


0.5 (0.2–1.1) Factors associated with excessive duration of therapy for sinusitis 2.1 (1.0–4.2)


1.8 (0.6–5.2) 1.1 (0.4–2.8)a 1.4 (0.6–3.4)a


0.8 (0.4–1.7) 0.6 (0.2–1.9)a


0.7 (0.3–1.6)


6.6 (1.8–24.9) 0.1 (0.04–0.5) 0.4 (0.1–1.3)


0.9 (0.3–2.3) 0.04 (0.004–0.3) Factors associated with incorrect antibiotic dose for pharyngitis 1.0 (0.5–2.2)


0.5 (0.2–1.3) 1.8 (0.8–4.2)a 2.9 (1.3–6.6)a


0.8 (0.3–1.8)


0.4 (0.1–1.3) 1.9 (0.7–5.0) 3.8 (1.6–9.1)


NOTE. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ED, emergency department. aP value<.20 on bivariate analysis.


993


incomplete medical record documentation may have led to over- estimation of the proportion of sinusitis cases in which an anti- biotic was not indicated. Finally, the relatively small sample size limited the statistical power of the logistic regression models and precluded inclusion of all potentially relevant variables in the final models. In conclusion, considerable opportunity exists to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions in both acute sinusitis and pharyngitis. This study highlights the idea that optimizing pre- scribing in ambulatory care requires attention to all 4 aspects of the stewardship mantra: “Right antibiotic, at the right dose, at the right time, and for the right duration,” and our findings support the CDC recommendation to identify high-priority conditions for initial stewardship interventions.2


Supplementary material. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2018.117


Acknowledgments Financial support. No financial support was provided relevant to this article.


Conflicts of interest. All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.


References 1. National action plan for combating antibiotic-resistant bacteria. March 2015. The White House website. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/ default/files/docs/national_action_plan_for_combating_antibotic-resistant_ bacteria.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed April 6, 2015.


2. Sanchez GV, Fleming-Dutra KE, Roberts RM, Hicks LA. Core elements of outpatient antibiotic stewardship. MMWR 2016;65:1–12.


3. Fleming-Dutra KE, Hersh AL, Shapiro DJ, et al. Prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions among US ambulatory care visits, 2010–2011. JAMA 2016;315:1864–1873.


4. Fairlie T, Shapiro DJ, Hersh AL, Hicks LA. National trends in visit rates and antibiotic prescribing for adults with acute sinusitis. Arch Int Med 2012;172:1513–1514.


5. Hersh AL, Fleming-Dutra KE, Shapiro DJ, Hyun DY, Hicks LA. Frequency of first-line antibiotic selection among US ambulatory care visits for otitis media, sinusitis, and pharyngitis. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:1870–1872.


6. McCaig LF, Hicks LA, Roberts RM, Fairlie TA. Office-related antibiotic prescribing for persons aged ≤14 years—United States, 1993–1994 to 2007–2008. MMWR 2011;60:1153–1156.


a substantial opportunity to shorten treatment durations. In aggregate, our data highlight that in addition to prescription of antibiotics when not indicated, incorrect antibiotic choice, dose, and duration of therapy are common prescribing errors that are important targets for intervention. These errorsmay be particularly amenable to electronic health record–based interventions. Our logistic regression models suggest that the urgent care and emer- gency department settings may be an important area of focus. This study has several limitations. This study was performed in


a single ambulatory-care network with an active antibiotic stew- ardship program; hence, these results may not be generalizable to other practice settings. Furthermore, given the retrospective design,


7. Barnett ML, Linder JA. Antibiotic prescribing to adults with sore throat in the United States, 1997–2010. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:138–140.


8. King LM, Sanchez GV, Bartoces M, Hicks LA, Fleming-Dutra KE. Antibiotic therapy duration in US adults with sinusitis. JAMA Intern Med 2018. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0407.


9. Gabow P, Eisert S, Wright R. Denver Health: a model for the integration of a public hospital and community health centers. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:143–149.


10. Chow AW, Benninger MS, Brook I, et al. IDSA clinical practice guideline for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in children and adults. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:e72–e112.


11. Shulman ST, Bisno AL, Clegg HW, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis: 2012 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:1279–1282.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140