search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Industry News


Kent teenager was left to live in tent during Covid crisis


pandemic after his family was left homeless, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found. The Ombudsman determined the council missed


A


at least five opportunities to house the teenager and his mother during the summer of 2020, but instead they were left to sleep rough. When the mother first approached the council,


it decided it had no duty to house her and her 16-year-old son under its homelessness obligations. However, it did place the family in temporary accommodation because of its child protection duties. The family became homeless in the middle


of July 2020 when the children’s services department asked them to leave their temporary accommodation. In making the family homeless, the council failed to consider Government guidance in force during the lockdown, which asked landlords to work with renters who may experience hardship as a result of the pandemic. When they left the temporary accommodation,


the family had nowhere to go. The teenager called the council saying he and his mother were sleeping in a tent. The mother continued to contact the council throughout July. She filled in a change of circumstances form at the beginning of August explaining she and her son had been on the streets for a few weeks. There is no record of the council taking any action upon receipt of the form.


Kent teenager was left to sofa surf and live in a tent for almost two months by Medway Council during the Covid


The family became homeless in the middle of July 2020 when the children’s services department asked them to leave their temporary accommodation. In making the family homeless, the council failed to consider Government guidance in force during the lockdown, which asked landlords to work with renters who may experience hardship as a result of the pandemic


MISSED OPPORTUNITIES At the beginning of September, the mother contacted the council with the help of Shelter to say she and her son had been homeless since 13 July. The council told the mother it would not provide her with temporary accommodation and she should find her own private rented accommodation. The mother contacted the Ombudsman on 8


September. The investigator asked the council to make an urgent review of the case. The family were moved to bed and breakfast on 11 September. During the investigation, the council offered them a two-bedroomed property. Michael King, Local Government and Social


Care Ombudsman, said: “The council in this case failed in its duties to a vulnerable teenager who was sleeping rough and it missed numerous opportunities to ensure he was safe. I do, however, welcome the swift action the council took when we


alerted it to the family’s situation, and hope the training it has agreed to provide to relevant staff should ensure cases such as this do not happen in future.” In this case the council has agreed to apologise


to the teenager and his mother, and pay them £1,500 each to reflect the distress and hardship they were caused. It will also pay the mother an additional £200 to reflect the fact she was not listened to when she reported being homeless on a number of occasions. The council has also agreed to decide


whether the teenager is owed any duty or service under the Children Act and provide that service, and it should also consider if it owes him any duty under the Housing Act. It will also decide whether the mother is owed the full housing duty and issue her with a written decision on her homelessness application.


Welfare system’s fraud and error rates at record high


Fraud and errors on the main Universal Credit benefit have reached record levels with a staggering £8.4billion lost in 2020/21, up from £4.6bn the previous year. According to figures from the Department of


Work and Pensions the rise is almost entirely due to fraud while the number of people claiming UC has doubled to six million since the start of the pandemic. Overall more than £200 billion is being paid out annually in benefits. Officials say the increased level of fraud is a


result of more people applying for the benefit and the monetary value of each fraudulent case rising, rather than a higher proportion of people engaging in fraud. The overall level of fraud and error across the whole of the benefits system increased by almost


two-thirds, from 2.4 last year to 3.9 per cent, the highest ever reported rate. But the fraud rate on Universal Credit increased by more than 50 per cent over the past year and now stands at 14.5 per cent. Cases of fraud vary from individuals claiming


money to which they are not entitled (such as not declaring income from other sources) to criminal gangs stealing people's details to apply for advance payments of UC. It is believed the majority of identity thefts affect vulnerable tenants on low- incomes, who then face the threat of eviction if they rack up debts and cannot pay their rent. Despite the huge increase in fraud, the DWP still


says the vast majority of claims are genuine and the benefit provides a vital safety net for people in need. In response to a massive increase in claims at the beginning of lockdown, in March and April


20 | HMM June/July 2021 | www.housingmmonline.co.uk


It is believed the majority of identity thefts affect vulnerable tenants on low-incomes, who then face the threat of eviction if they rack up debts and cannot pay their rent


the Government relaxed some admin rules – identity checks were processed on-line and some information such as rent levels were taken on trust.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52