search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADVOCACY SPOTLIGHT This website is a great resource


for individuals and families because it clearly shows the savings that ASCs provide to both Medicare’s benefi- ciaries and the Medicare program. It also has illustrated a long-standing payment discrepancy between ASCs and HOPDs. For example, after years of ASCA’s advocacy during the rule- making process, the Centers for Medi- care & Medicaid Services (CMS) moved code 27447, which indicates a total knee arthroplasty, onto the ASC- payable list. In an ASC, the total cost for this procedure would be about $8,609, with the beneficiary facing a $1,721 copay and Medicare reimbursing $6,887. In the HOPD, the total cost for this procedure would be about $11,900, with the beneficiary facing


a $1,408 copay and Medicare reim- bursing $10,492. In this instance, a beneficiary’s copay is higher in the ASC than in the HOPD, with the ben- eficiary facing a $313 penalty for receiving care in an ASC and the cost to Medicare about $3,290 higher. This penalty occurs because a ben-


eficiary’s copay is capped when they receive care in an HOPD. For code 27447, and all codes that have a total cost greater than or equal to $7,040, a beneficiary’s copay for HOPD ser- vices is capped at $1,408, which is the deductible amount for inpatient care under Medicare Part A. Congress extended the Part A deductible for inpatient services to outpatient HOPD services under Part B in legislation that was signed into law in 1999. That law also made


HOPDs whole for the difference in the capped copay and what other- wise would have been the beneficia- ry’s coinsurance responsibility. This change was made to protect ben- eficiaries and increase access to the more efficient side of the hospital. When Congress directed HHS to


revise the ASC reimbursement sys- tem in 2003, however, the language of that bill did not include a provi- sion similar to the 1999 law that capped HOPD copayments, which has resulted in a difference in pay- ments. This copay cap issue impacts 134 codes on the ASC payable list, which is about 4 percent of the codes payable under Medicare.


This raises a host of issues. First and foremost, beneficiaries are pena- lized by a higher copay if they choose


When it comes to QI,  you need.


Meetings QI Studies Incidents


ASC Staff Tracker WebQI Audits


Credentialing Surveys


Logs


Book a Demo ASC FOCUS OCTOBER 2020 | ascfocus.org 39


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52