search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CHAMBER NEWS


Leicester on lockdown - a blow to the local economy


On 29 June, Leicester became the first area of the UK to be placed into a local lockdown, setting it back several weeks while the rest of the country geared up for the reopening of pubs, restaurants and other venues. Chris Hobson (pictured), director of policy and external affairs at East Midlands Chamber, explains how this has impacted businesses.


Some christened it “Super Saturday”, while others labelled it as England’s “Independence Day” given its coincidental overlap with the American federal holiday. But while the UK celebrated the


reopening of pubs, restaurants, cinemas and hairdressers on 4 July after three-and-a-half months of Covid-enforced closures, there was no one marking the occasion in Leicester. That’s because just five days


earlier, the Government had imposed a local lockdown on the city, along with parts of neighbouring local authorities, due to a reported rise in local infections. It meant businesses in the hospitality industry that had forked out on perishable stock in anticipation of welcoming back customers were suddenly out of pocket. Being forced to waste this money


has created more significant and underappreciated financial problems – the last thing they needed after an extremely challenging period since nationwide lockdown begun on 23 March.


While the overarching reason for


the local lockdown was understood as necessary for wider public safety, the decision by the Government on 9 July not to provide any additional, tailored support to Leicester businesses was a massive mistake. Many businesses had taken


advantage of the relief packages offered at the start of lockdown, which have proven to be a lifeline for many. But without additional help, there will unfortunately be a greater number of business failures in organisations that, without the impact of the forced closures, would otherwise be fundamentally sound. We, along with many others,


have lobbied Government to provide additional support. We have argued this needs to be in the form of grants, as opposed to debt, to prevent storing up greater problems for 12 months’ time once interest rates pick up or deferred VAT needs to be paid. We have even made suggestions


of where this funding might be found, drawing on underspend in original grant money existing in local authorities across the country.


‘The decision by the Government on 9 July not to provide any additional, tailored support to Leicester businesses was a massive mistake’


Leicester and the surrounding authorities – along with any future local authorities affected – should be able to access some of this pot to deliver hyperlocal support to businesses impacted. Importantly, we have stressed


the importance of clarity over what an exit strategy may look like, so businesses can be supported in their planning and decision-making. At the time of writing, we are yet


to get any positive response from Government. Indeed, when the first review of the lockdown took place on 16 July – which took into account the more granular data available – the criteria for decision- making seemed even more unclear, with some parts on the outskirts of the city released from lockdown while others with comparable levels of infection remained in lockdown.


So where does this leave Leicester, along with any other part of the country that may suffer a similar fate in the future? Since the extension was


confirmed, Government has announced new local powers for authorities to enforce closures where they identify emerging problems. There will likely be future localised outbreaks but these new powers, combined with timely,


localised data – which, four months into the pandemic, must be within our capability as a country – may help avoid huge swathes of a local area being held back unnecessarily. This would enable local


government to effectively balance public safety with the needs of the whole economy. But these new powers come too


late for Leicester, which now risks finding itself at the wrong end of a two-tier economic recovery. Westminster has hopefully


learned that a city-wide lockdown is a blunt instrument. And that blunt instrument has hit both the cashflow and confidence of local businesses and communities in and around Leicester. These people have picked


themselves up time and again over recent months, and they will be the ones that drive the ultimate economic recovery from coronavirus. They are created by local


entrepreneurs, based in local communities and employ local people, and through no fault of their own they find themselves at a significant disadvantage to the rest of the country. They now need all of our support


– including that of Government – in order to get through this and hopefully emerge as a stronger, more resilient economy.


business network August/September 2020 29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72