search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HERITAGE & HISTORIC (INCLUDING ADAPTIVE RE-USE) SUPPLEMENT


Bring on the heritage Code of Practice


Michael Hallé of Welsh Slate discusses the challenges around re-roofing heritage buildings, and why Historic England’s Code of Practice is sorely needed


roofs we come across. But coupled with the challenge and prestige of working on heritage roofs comes the fact there is often no precedent or British Standard regulation to guide the specifier or for them to comply with. This is because in the former case they have not been re-roofed before, and in the latter, because the current British Standard does not cover heritage roofs specifically. BS 5534 gives recommendations primarily intended for the design, performance and installation of new-build pitched roofs, with the heritage get-out clause: “The recommendations contained in this British Standard might not be appropriate for the re-slating or re-tiling of some old roofs, particularly where traditional and/or reclaimed materials are used.”


T


It is quite rightly used by the industry as the best practice for quality roofing, but like most industry standards the technical aspects prompt discussion – heritage roofs were constructed based on learned experience of very local conditions whereas British Standards are a generalised standard taking into account national conditions and practices. So it is reassuring to hear that Historic England is making headway on a Code of Practice for heritage roofing. Chris Wood, senior architectural conservator for Historic England’s Building Conservation and Geospatial Survey, said: “Before we can produce the Code of Practice we need to finish the technical guidance needed to support it. We are near to finishing Parts 1 and 2, which we will be sending out for review in the next month or so.


“The proposed Code of Practice will take a few months as there is likely to be quite a lot of consultation and review.”


o most of us in the roofing industry, heritage roofs are an interesting diversion from the run-of-the-mill


59


Vernacular roofing consultant Terry Hughes, who will produce the first draft, said: “This advice is needed because the trend to standardisation since the 1940s when CP142 was written, and as exemplified by British Standards, is that roofing has become just that: everything is standard; the same wherever you are, particularly for metamorphic slates. “And what has been lost is the variety of roofscapes which were a response to the local materials. The knowledge of how they were slated has often been lost as well. There is a need for these old roofs to be carefully looked at and understood before they are repaired or re-slated. All too often the roof is stripped without doing this, and then replaced with what is incorrectly thought to be the detailing, or a so-called improvement.”


Historic England’s use of the term ‘Code of Practice’ is telling and rightly so, as it would seem there cannot be a “standard” for heritage roofs as they are rarely, if ever, standard. This myriad of variations, even within local areas, is the main reason


When it does come to replacing a heritage roof, steps should always be taken to carefully record the way it has been set out


ADF APRIL/MAY 2020


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108