search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
58 HERITAGE & HISTORIC (INCLUDING ADAPTIVE RE-USE) SUPPLEMENT


Tracy Pomfret of George Barnsdale & Sons talks through the benefits of customisation in timber windows, when trying to strike the balance between designers’ vision and planning departments’ requirements in heritage projects


Getting the balance right E


nvironmental concerns among architects have seen timber windows and doors become an increasingly


The best manufacturers will have built and


programmed their systems in such a way that customisation is possible and most requirements can be met


popular choice. In the case of heritage and historic properties, ‘like for like’ replacement is very often specified. In such cases, the need to balance the architect’s vision for a project with the demands of the planning and conservation officer and the current Building Regulations has never been easy. Manufacturers have tried to develop their manufacturing processes to deliver a standard product range that can be easily performance tested and replicated in a far more cost-effective way than those made the old, labour intensive way – by hand. Traditionally, a bespoke joinery company would make you anything you wanted in any shape and size. That was before tested thermal performance data, PAS24 and acoustics entered the arena. Unfortunately, those days are gone. Today, if a developer wishes to convert a Grade II listed building into luxury apartments in the heart of Westminster, they are likely to be told they must retain the original facade, repair the timber windows or replace with like for like. They are also expected to ensure that whatever changes internally, the exterior of the building must retain its original aesthetic. Since the developer will want to sell the apartments at a high price to discerning clients, they are likely to have also asked the architect to ensure the windows incorporate the highest possible thermal and acoustic performance. For manufacturers, this is a real challenge. Most of the leading timber window companies have set up their systems to be fairly standardised, which often means there is little room for customisation. Architects often find themselves being asked to compromise on the vision they have been working up for the last two or three years. The best manufacturers will have built and programmed their systems in such a way that customisation is possible and most requirements can be met. For example, a


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


large sliding sash window can be made to accommodate 25 mm single glazed acoustic glass, and adorned with replica sash horns. The data is already in the system to show it will deliver the required security, weather performance and acoustic requirements despite it being a bespoke product. Sometimes a compromise will still need to be made. Single acoustic glazing is never going to offer the same thermal performance as a double-glazed unit, for example. This can lead to discussions between planning and Building Control; and as we know, planning usually wins this one. In terms of sustainability, while manufacturers use FSC certified timber, many still find themselves with a lot of waste since their systems and processes haven’t been optimised to reduce it. A few companies are geared up to use multiple section sizes, meaning they have far less waste as well as being able to offer the customer many more design options and profiles. This means that customisation is possible without compromising on efficiency, enabling more competitive pricing.


For companies are not currently able to offer high levels of customisation, it is possible to do the development work and invest in the external testing, but there is no guarantee the window will pass, and then it’s back to the drawing board. This can really slow down the process and is a risk for the project management team.


Some projects require variation in glazing by facade, such as acoustic performance, different interfaces and varying levels of security. This makes customisation even more challenging for manufacturers used to making a standard tested product. When it comes to commercial fenestration, there is only one thing that can be guaranteed – balancing ever changing Regs, planning restrictions and aesthetic requirements isn’t going to get any easier!


Tracy Pomfret is marketing manager at George Barnsdale & Sons


ADF APRIL/MAY 2020


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108