search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
31


BUILDING PROJECTS


RIVERSIDE LEISURE CENTRE CHELMSFORD


Playful I


participation


In designing a riverside replacement for Chelmsford’s main swimming pool and gym, Pick Everard followed a brief to increase local community participation. James Parker reports


n 2014, Chelmsford City Council undertook a condition survey on the only sports complex with a pool in the city boundaries, an outdated 1960s building with 1980s additions. This found that the centre could be kept running with a £9m refurbishment, but it would not be able to meet increasing demand; what’s more the council had a strong goal to increase participation in sports and leisure in the local community.


The decision was made to retain and refurbish the viable elements of the centre – the 1980s ice rink and sports centre – but provide a new, fit-for-purpose, modern pool and gym to replace the old facilities, driven by the motto of “the best leisure offer for the most people.” The £30m works were supported by a £1.5m grant from Sport England, who have “changed focus from an elite sports body to being more about increasing health and participation,” says project architect at Pick Everard, Justin Ashworth.


Against this background, it was key to make the building as inviting as possible to the community, and enhance its function as an important public building for Chelmsford. In light of this, the client wanted to appoint an experienced practice, and Pick Everard have delivered a wide array of sports and leisure projects, such as an Olympic legacy project at Hadleigh Park, as well as military training, school pools, and local authority swimming pool refurbishments across the south east.


The replacement pool and gym scheme was originally developed up to RIBA stage 2 by specialist architect Paul Weston, who “helped the council make decisions on strategy, such as around keeping the old pool open while we built the new one,” says Ashworth. He adds that the constraints around the phased construction “kind of selected the site for us, because we built on the car park while the old centre was still in operation.” As well as Weston’s expertise, the project benefitted from Sport England’s input – from helping make the business case robust and futureproofed, to assisting the council with programming at the centre, and “links with clubs and organisations at national level” to help ensure the centre’s potential is used to its full.


The organisation also has the knowledge (including via its links with Swimming England) to provide design advice on the pool itself, and Pick Everard worked closely with Sport England technical adviser David Hemsley throughout to ensure that the pool had a robust specification. “It means we are providing the client with a building that has proven finishes and construction methods – ones that Sport England know lasts,” says Ashworth. He mentions that as well as attending early design meetings and providing feedback, Sport England also regularly attended site progress meetings to ensure the specification was being delivered. He adds: “This building will be used 364 days a year, from 5.30 am until 10


ADF APRIL/MAY 2020 WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108