search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
4 NEWS


Managing Editor James Parker jparker@netmagmedia.co.uk


Publisher Anthony Parker aparker@netmagmedia.co.uk


Editorial Co-ordinator Shelley Collyer


Editorial Assistants Roseanne Field Jack Wooler


Editorial Contributor Sébastien Reed


Studio Manager Mikey Pooley


Production Assistants Georgia Musson Kim Musson


Account Managers Sheehan Edmonds Paul Field


Sales Executives Nathan Hunt Steve Smith


PR Executives Suzanne Easter Kim Friend


Audience Development Manager Jane Spice


Managing Director Simon Reed


Advertising & Administration t 01435 863500 info@netmagmedia.co.uk www.architectsdatafile.co.uk


Press Releases editorial@netmagmedia.co.uk


Subscription circulation enquiries info@netmagmedia.co.uk


netMAGmedia Ltd Cointronic House Station Road, Heathfield East Sussex, TN21 8DF


netMAG media


publishing – ver tical search


FROM THE EDITOR


T


he new Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick has joined Oliver Letwin’s offensive on poor quality house design, promising system-wide changes to the “broken” planning system to try and leverage quality. He is promoting a package of measures in the wake of the National Design Guide which he launched at the Stirling Prize ceremony in October, and which has received less than a glowing response from the architectural community so far.


However, Jenrick is not explicitly targeting architects delivering poor design, but large developers, many of whom do not use external architects for housebuilding. A survey by architect Robert Guy at Bristol practice Arturus found in 2015 that the top 25 housebuilders directly employed a grand total of 46 architectural firms, with three practices making up half of that list.


The Secretary of State says he will shortly unveil a planning White Paper (based on the Letwin Review into housebuilding) which will radically reform the “exceptionally complex and convoluted planning system” that has developed over the past 75 years. Jenrick said he was welcoming comments from industry.


He was putting the focus on community involvement as well as industry, saying that the White Paper would attempt to make the system work for “consumers who interact with it,” small builders “of which we need far more,” as well as large developers.


Few would argue with those precepts, however the Housing Department’s ‘model design code,’ due to be issued in the new year nationally and then rolled out locally, is likely to be where the battles emerge in the architectural sphere. Guidance is to be welcomed, but the more prescriptive (and therefore potentially useful on the ground) it is, the more it’s likely to raise questions. One hopes it’s been properly consulted on within the industry.


Each local authority is going to have to create its own code based on the national model, incorporating local architectural traditions and community viewpoints. This is obviously a sensible concept, however rigour in ensuring that quality reaches a general benchmark might be at risk of disappearing in a fog of focus groups, where construction and architectural knowledge might come second to potentially more subjective concerns.


Annual subscription costs just £48 for 12 issues, including post and packing. Phone 01435 863500 for details. Individual copies of the publication are available at £5 each inc p & p. All rights reserved


No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying, recording or stored in any information retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in Architects Datafile, the publisher can accept no responsibility for the claims or opinions made by contributors, manufacturers or advertisers. Editorial contributors to this journal may have made a payment towards the reproduction costs of material used to illustrate their products. The manufacturer of the paper used within our publication is a Chain-of-Custody certified supplier operating within environmental systems certified to both ISO 14001 and EMAS in order to ensure sustainable production. Printed in England


The big question of course is whether the quality can be preserved across the board when the numbers required are immense, particularly in London, which the ONS estimates needs 844,000 new homes by 2041. Fewer than 54,000 have been built in the previous two years. Across the UK, new private housing numbers fell over the summer, driven by Brexit uncertainty, but the industry is struggling to get near the 300,000 home target.


Modular could be the answer which delivers on both the quality and speed fronts, and it’s being adopted in various pockets of the industry. However, whether the mainstream housebuilding industry wants to, or can adapt to such a big shift in its supply chain in time, is doubtful (law firm Pinsent Masons reckon around 15,000 of the current 200,000 homes built annually are modular). Jenrick may find that builders need much more financial as well as design guidance.


James Parker Editor


11.19


ON THE COVER... intu Watford by Leslie Jones Architecture has undergone a major extension and refurbishment to give visitors a new exciting and even uplifting experience by incorporate leisure amenities.


INTU SHOPPING CENTRE, WATFORD


Leslie Jones Architecture extends and refurbishes a centre to provide retail and leisure excitement, plus engagement with the high street


SERPENTINE COFFEE HOUSE, LONDON A sculptural new cafe for Hyde Park resembles a smiling stingray


For the full report on this project, go to page 37


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


ADF NOVEMBER 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100