search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEWS


Two NGOs seek retraction of US agencies’ crumb rubber study


Finding that ‘exposure to humans appears limited’ is not supported by the evidence say PEER and the Ecology Center


Two Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs) have filed a request for the US EPA to retract its recent study on recycled tyre crumb rubber materials, claiming that the report violates information quality guidelines.


The 6 August complaint from the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) and the Ecology Center (Michigan) has come in response to a joint report from the EPA and the Agency for Toxics Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). In it, the agencies found that, whilst there are a variety of chemicals present in the materials - commonly used in playgrounds and synthetic turf fields - human exposure to these “appears to be limited”.


The conclusion, however, was criticised as “premature”, particularly because the second part of the agencies’ studies is to focus on human exposure and has yet to be released.


And PEER and the Ecology Center are now seeking for the agency to retract its conclusion and conduct further studies on the safety of artificial turf, in order “to ensure the objectivity,


utility, and integrity of the information EPA disseminates to the public.”


The letter, filed under the Information Quality Act, argues that the study is “based on inaccurate, incomplete, and unreliable information regarding the potential risks to human health and the environment”.


Specific concerns include statements that it: • used an ‘inaccurate’ lead testing methodology


• tested for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) at ‘inadequate’ temperatures


• failed to consider the combined effects of various chemical components of tire crumbs or the impact of substances that lack toxicity information


And the conclusion it draws on exposure, they say, “is not supported by the evidence and is outside the scope of its assessment”.


Therefore, the NGOs are asking for the EPA to retract its conclusion and issue a public statement that the study has been withdrawn.


Moreover, they want the agency to “either undertake an adequate testing protocol that cures the flaws enumerated above, or reissue the report with explanations of these additional limitations and removal of all conclusory statements about low exposure to the chemicals associated with artificial turf”.


The organisations have requested a response within 90 days.


See also ‘Blinding us with science?’ on pages 14-15 of this issue.


Bring a touch of class to every surface


Cylinder Mowers


Powered & Tractor Mounted – Slitters Aerators Scarifi ers


Spreaders & Top Dressers


Tractor Mounted – Brushes Sweepers Seeders


Ride on Brushes Croquet/Tennis Football/Hockey/Rugby Cricket Golf Lawns Amenity Synthetic


For more information on our full range of grounds maintenance equipment or a no obligation demonstration call 01332 824777


www.dennisuk.com www.sisis.com World class turf maintenance equipment


PC August/September 2019 5


Mounted and Towed Implement frames Hand Tools


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156