20
Issue 3 2019 - FBJNA
///LOGISTICS CORRIDORS
Logistics corridors are crucial to overall economic vitality
By John Jeter
Here’s the funny thing about logistics corridors. Sea and inland ports are expanding geographically to shrink time and to serve -- even faster
-- today’s click-‘n’-
get consumers. One of the nation’s largest inland hubs even expanded its name. “‘Corridor’ is way too narrow
a term for us in Columbus,” says David Whitaker, CCO at the Columbus Regional Airport Authority in Ohio’s state capital. “The entire Columbus region is a transportation platform for the logistics industry.” It’s
so much so that the
Rickenbacker Inland Port is being renamed “North American International Freight Center.” “Certainly, inland and dry
ports are formally defined and can still be applied to our activities here, but we moved to the Freight Center terminology as more fitting,” he says. The region boasts 300 million square feet of
industrial development under one
roof; four intermodal
yards; two airports; and “lots of truck-worthy roads.” Then there’s the
information superhighway. Chattanooga, TN, now bills itself as “freight alley.” “A deep talent pool that
blends logistics expertise and entrepreneurial energy have made Chattanooga the Silicon Valley of freight,” says Charles Wood, vice president of Economic Development for Area Chamber of Commerce there.
Gargantuan projects
As lofty as “international freight center” and “freight alley” may sound, “mega” is a relatively new label for gargantuan projects that are, yes, putting seaports closer to intermodal hubs ever-farther inland. Check out the Georgia Port
Authority’s Mason MegaRail initiative. The $218.5 million project will double the Port of
“Locating rail hubs deeper into the supply chain could open up new
business opportunities and would be attractive to exporters.” -- John Wolfe, NWSA
Savannah’s rail capacity to 1 million container lifts per year with the addition of 10 rail tracks that can accommodate 10,000-foot-long trains. “Longer, more cost-effective
trains incentivize Norfolk Southern and CSX to provide direct, expedited rail service to the Mid-American Arc, stretching from Memphis to St. Louis, Chicago, Columbus and Ohio Valley,” says Griff
Lynch, executive director of the Savannah port. The longer tentacles of
the MegaRail’s first phase, slated to open later this year with completion next year, is expected to cut transit times to the greater Midwest by 24 hours. “A new competitive
environment on both speed to market and lower cost is driving customer demand for the GPA to expand its service market,” he says. The GPA’s also expanding
its own corridor with the Appalachian Regional Port, the authority’s first owned and operated inland terminal
The trend toward larger ships and e-commerce at
the Port of Los Angeles has accelerated the need for good inland connections. (Port of Los Angeles photo.)
accommodate larger ships by dredging harbors, raising cranes and adding capacity to container yards.” “From a seaport’s
perspective, it’s important to have good connections to inland markets. The trend toward larger ships and e-commerce has accelerated these needs,” he says. John Wolfe, CEO of The
in northwest Georgia. With target markets
reaching to
Alabama, Tennessee, and Kentucky, the ARP aims to offset 710 truck miles on Georgia highways with each round-trip container moved via the corridor, among other benefits, Lynch says. Meanwhile, at other ports,
Mario Cordero, executive director at Port of Long Beach, says coastal terminals are
“generally working to
“‘Corridor’ is way too narrow a term for us in Columbus.”
-- David Whitaker, Columbus Regional Airport Authority
Northwest Seaport Alliance, concurs. “Locating rail hubs deeper into the supply chain could open up new business opportunities and would be especially attractive to exporters,” he says. He notes, however, that the
NWSA is still in the very early stages of exploring inland rail hubs. “It just makes good business sense to explore these options thoroughly,” her says.
Interstate interactivity
All this infrastructure interconnectivity requires interstate interactivity. Tha t’ s already the
21 >>
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24