LIVE 24-SEVEN
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD AND THE PRENUP
It may be that the divorce rate for heterosexual couples in England and Wales has hit a 45-year low, but if your marriage becomes a statistic, how can you protect your wealth?
A prenuptial agreement, signed before the marriage, can set in place what will happen to your income and assets before the arguments begin.
Prenups are becoming more popular in England and Wales, often spearheaded by parents as their offspring tie the knot.
Ashley Wynne, Head of the Family Law Group at No5 Barristers’ Chambers, said: “Historically I drafted occasional pre-nuptial agreements for hugely wealthy individuals. I am now being asked to draft them far more regularly and in cases which do not involve unusually large assets”
76
The reasons for signing a prenup vary, but for some it is often due to an existing or expected difference in their wealth. Equally, inheritance can be significant as one person may wish to protect assets that may have been built up by their family, and to protect each party from debt risk.
“Over 60s, who are marrying for the second time, are also increasingly turning to the prenup to protect their children’s inheritance – which can often include wealth sourced from an earlier divorce settlement! The landmark case of Radmacher v Granatino set a benchmark as it is the first time that a court said a prenup would be upheld unless one person could show why it should not be.
Ashley added: “The decision was a ‘game-changer’ in terms of the status prenups are afforded within the English and Welsh courts due to a change of legal emphasis – the party wishing to avoid the effect of the agreement is required to prove that it is unfair (rather than the other party being required to prove that it is ‘fair’ or ‘reasonable’ as remains the case in Scots Law).
“The English and Welsh courts retain the discretion to ‘avoid’ the terms of the agreement if its impact would be unfair to one of the parties or in particular, any dependent children of the marriage. Case-law (and recommendations from the Law Commission) suggests that there are certain features of a prenup that should be present in order to give the agreement the best chance of being upheld:
• Both parties should take separate legal advice regarding the agreement. Prenups should be drafted by specialist lawyers who are acting to protect their own client’s interests.
• Both parties must ensure that they understand the terms and effect of the agreement and neither party should feel pressured or coerced into the agreement, it should bear in mind that the agreement is suggested by the party who feels that he or she has brought significant assets into the marriage.
• Both parties should provide full disclosure of their property and assets. It will be difficult to persuade a court to uphold an agreement in circumstances where the other party had no idea as to the nature and extent of the assets the agreement was intended to protect.
• The agreement should not be signed in the days immediately prior to the wedding. Often, one party will make the agreement a condition of the marriage
going ahead, and when the wedding is booked and paid for the other party is much more likely to feel pressured into signing.
“Complying with these basic requirements should limit the prospects of the agreement being regarded as ineffective in the event that the marriage does end in divorce on or before the 30th anniversary.”
LIVE24-SEVEN.COM
BUS INE S S NO5 BARRI S T ERS ’ CHAMBERS
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124
