search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Feature


Industry calls for UK to stay in European health & safety regime post Brexit


Wide ranging review of Health & Safety landscape shows major issues for Government to address


Britain’s manufacturers are calling for the current health & safety landscape to be maintained when the UK leaves the European Union, with existing worker production and legislative requirements continuing to be transferred into UK law to avoid cost and disruption to business. The call is made in a wide-ranging report


into the UK’s health & safety landscape published today by EEF, the manufacturers’ organisation and leading health & safety experts Arco entitled ‘Making Health & Safety work for UK Business – manufacturers’ concerns in a post Brexit World’. In particular, the report says it is vital


that the British Standards Institution (BSI) continues to play a leading role in European standards setting so that UK companies can continue to make products set within the European standards environment. This is essential to ensure UK companies can continue to trade without the risk of technical barriers emerging and to avoid the unnecessary development of multiple standards. Commenting, Terry Woolmer, Head of


Health & Safety policy at EEF, said: “There is a clear message from manufacturers that there should be no rapid change post Brexit to the UK’s health & safety regulatory regime. The Government’s current approach of grandfathering existing EU worker protection and product safety standards into UK law for the foreseeable future is the right one. “This is essential to avoid costly disruption,


the emergence of any technical barriers and the development of unnecessary multiple standards which might damage the prospects of some companies being able to operate seamlessly when the UK leaves the EU.” “It is also vital that BSI continues to


play a leading role in setting the European standards environment, a position where the UK has substantial expertise.


12 fmuk Lee Pickering, Head of Heavy


Manufacturing at Arco, said: “This reports clearly identifies the concerns and beliefs of leaders within the sector, giving policymakers a vital insight into how manufacturing bosses believe Brexit should be rolled out. We agree that that a rapid change in regulation post Brexit isn’t the correct approach as it would cause disruption but we also believe Brexit affords us an opportunity to review and improve health & safety regulations within the UK.


Key findings: • 97% of companies want no


immediate change in regulations post Brexit, though just over half want review at some point


• Just 3% of companies want to revert to pre EU health & safety regulation


• Essential that BSI remains part of European standards regime for product regulation and worker protection


• Little sign that increased Health & Safety fines altering behaviour


• Just two fifths of companies have reviewed their health & safety


procedures in response to changes in sentencing guidelines


What we don’t want to see happen once


we leave the EU is the Government using Brexit as a justification for complacency as there are issues within our current framework that urgently need addressing if we are to ensure the safety of UK workers.” According to the survey 42% of companies want no change to the current regulatory regime, whilst a further 55% want no immediate change, but would like a review of health & safety regulations once


the UK has left the EU. This might include more recent directives which are not risk based and where the level of health & safety benefits are more questionable. A desire for a review of the existing


landscape was significantly more pronounced amongst larger companies that may have the resources to deal with any change whilst smaller companies might prefer to deal with an existing scenario rather than face any disruption. As well as examining the European health & safety environment, the report takes a wide-ranging look at the UK domestic environment for health & safety which has seen significant regulatory change. The survey also shows the first impact


of the changes to Health & Safety fines introduced in 2016. In the manufacturing sector, fines doubled between 2015/16 to 2016/17 from £12.5m to £25.1m, resulting in an average fine of just under £160k. Despite this large increase, two fifths of companies have taken no action to review their procedures whilst a third of companies had not seen any increase in involvement of senior management in health & safety since 2012, bucking a long term trend of improvement. According to EEF, the fact that


substantial changes in sentencing guidelines and increased fines have not altered company behaviour shows that


they are not changing management culture towards health & safety and are merely a blunt tool revenue raising exercise for HM Treasury. In response, EEF believes that the revenue


raised from fines should be ring-fenced and used more proactively to promote health & safety, whilst courts should have stronger powers to issue remedial orders with the aim of bringing about lasting improvements to health & safety management systems and practices.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44