search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Roofing


Understanding the performance of roofing membranes


Iain Fairnington of A. Proctor Group provides an insight into the performance of roofing membranes and what this means for specifiers and contractors, in ensuring compliance with building standards and assured performance to reduce the risk of failure and minimise ongoing maintenance costs


F


or years the debate on how to achieve a true ventilation free cold-pitched roof has continued across the construction industry. Now architects and roofing contractors working on projects in both the


public and private sector are coming to the understanding that underlays can perform at an exceptional level, providing a failsafe option, without the need for additional ventilation.


IMPROVED THERMAL AND MOISTURE PERFORMANCE OF PITCHED ROOFS Te combination of cold-pitched roof construction and increasing thermal performance requirements has fuelled the tendency to place additional insulation above the ceiling joists, leading to an increased risk of condensation in the roof space. In an effort to combat this problem, the industry developed a series of breathable membranes, which were designed to be installed over the raſters as roof underlay, and allow the vapour to escape. Te majority of these membranes were vapour permeable, but airtight, rather


like a Gore-Tex jacket. While water-resistant, they did not completely prevent condensation within the roof space, meaning additional ventilation had to be introduced in order to allow air to circulate.


NOT ALL ROOFING UNDERLAYS ARE THE SAME Generally, two types of technological solutions have been presented to specifiers; vapour permeable, but airtight solutions, based on film laminated polypropylene technology, or a vapour and air permeable version, alleviating the need for additional ventilation.


“Roofing underlays come in all manner of different colours, but it’s what you can’t see that does most of the work – the middle layer” – Iain Fairnington, technical director, A. Proctor Group


Iain Fairnington, explains: “Roofing underlays come in all manner of different


colours, but it’s what you can’t see that does most of the work – the middle layer. While the colour of the top surface or underside is useful for identification, it is irrelevant in terms of performance. Tis middle layer can be likened to the same robustness as normal kitchen cling film and needs the protection of the sandwich construction to make this suitable and fit for purpose in a pitched roof. Taking a microscopic view of the middle layer clarifies the difference between an airtight and air permeable membrane. Te difference between air permeability and air tightness is fundamental to the products performance and use.”


BRITISH STANDARDS UPDATE – FEB 2018 CLEAR DEFINITION OF AIR PERMEABLE UNDERLAYS In February, a second amendment and updated version of the British Standard for Slating and Tiling BS5534 was introduced. For the very first time BS5534:2014 + A2:2018 now includes a clear industry definition of air permeable underlays.


www.housingmmonline.co.uk | HMM September 2018 | 43


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52