search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Energy Efficiency


Modern methods of countering cold-bridging


Mark Bowman of Marmox (UK) Ltd. offers an insight into tackling heat loss at the problematic floor-wall junction in masonry and hybrid constructions.


Ever since the days of the Egan Report and ‘Rethinking Construction’ the building industry has been presented with a bewildering multitude of system solutions, often featuring off-site technologies and unfamiliar materials, not always suited to UK climatic conditions or our workforce’s inherent skillset. The truth is that while panelised or modular designs - especially timber based systems - have gained market share thanks to Government and public sector housing initiatives, the wider industry remains more comfortable with what are still referred to as ‘traditional’ designs.


However, driven by increasingly more onerous energy reduction targets within the Building Regulations and Fabric Energy Efficiency Standards (FEES), masonry construction has metamorphosed from the basic brick and block cavity work which dominated the mid-20th century, to offering specifiers a selection of well-engineered wall constructions, able to meet modern performance standards.


Lightweight or aircrete blockwork inner leafs, often combined with full cavity fill insulation, and measures such as parge coats, have seen heat loss and air leakage through the external envelope drastically reduced. In fact hybrid traditional masonry constructions have even proved themselves capable of creating properties designed to the coveted German PassivHaus standard.


These remain, though, enduring challenges for consultants and contractors in maintaining continuity of insulation at particularly vulnerable areas of the envelope: essentially in preventing thermal-bridging at places like the window reveals or the floor-wall junction.


Physically, these thermal bridges create cold spots inside the building, which lead to problems of condensation and mould growth, with consequent health issues for occupants.


Approximately, 30% of a building’s heat loss can result from these areas and as properties have become better performing overall, the significance of thermal bridges has grown disproportionally. To counter their impact, regulators have loaded the SAP SEBM calculations to punish poor detailing, with elements such as steel lintels bridging cavities being obvious weak spots. However, it is the floor-wall junction often accounting for up to two-thirds of thermal bridge losses - which has been singled out for the toughest treatment.


Taking the Transition Heat Transfer Coefficient (HTB ) for the materials making


the bridge and dividing it by the surface areas of the building provides the y-value but SAP offers three very different approaches to assessing the effect of thermal bridges.


The ‘Default’ approach means adopting a y-value of 0.15W/m2 K: the equivalent


of having a hole the size of a garage door in the wall of a house, then there are Accredited Details which will reduce the imaginary hole by nearly half with a y-value of 0.08W/m2


Junctions which are rewarded with much lower y-values.


The conundrum then for the specifier is to identify an insulation with a high enough insulation value to extend the heat path around the junction and thereby cut heat loss, but still be able to support substantial structural loadings.


The solution developed by Marmox - adopted by countless consultants and loved by bricklayers for its simplicity of use - is a product known as Thermoblock.


MARMOX (UK) LTD TEL: 01634 835290 25 K. Best by far though is to use Thermally Modelled


Offering an installed length of 600mm and available in widths of 100, 140 and 215mm Thermoblocks transmit the load of the wall above through a series of high strength concrete columns. These though are surrounded in XPS insulation, to account for 85% of the total cross-section area and thereby minimise heat loss. This offers a combined thermal conductivity of 0.047WmK to input into the calculations.


The blocks feature a stepped interlock to which Marmox Multibond Sealant is normally applied, while a top and bottom surface of micro-fibre reinforced polymer concrete creates an excellent mortar key, and at 65mm in height the horizontal band of Thermoblocks is the same depth as a course of bricks. The vertical columns of concrete have a compressive strength of 9.0N/mm2 and enables them to be used within buildings up to three stories, including non-domestic structures. Under pressure from industry, especially the major housebuilders, Government accepted that further improvements in insulation values had reached a point where diminishing returns could not justify the very large additional costs of achieving them. Zero carbon targets have effectively been put on hold.


What we are presented with today is a far more pragmatic approach to reducing carbon emissions, where the practicalities of modern masonry construction, well suited to the British weather and existing workforce, offer an attractive answer. Marmox Thermoblocks, meanwhile, present an ideal means of addressing the building envelope’s most problematic area for potential energy wastage.


WWW.MARMOX.CO.UK SALES@MARMOX.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56