London is the world’s leading seat of maritime arbitration, and it has unique benefits, explains Ian Gaunt, President at The London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA).
The LMAA is the world’s leading body specialized in commercial maritime dispute resolution. With over 700 full
and supporting members practicing in London, LMAA is admired for the promotion of practical procedures conducted under the English Arbitration Act 1996.
Gaunt was elected President of the LMAA in 2017, and has broad knowledge on commercial,
technical and legal aspects of ship sale and purchase, shipbuilding and related financing agreements. Arbitration experience includes disputes concerning shipbuilding, ship repair and conversion contracts, charterparties, sale and purchase agreements and contracts of affreightment.
Why is London considered to be a main arbitration point?
London is the most popular venue for commercial arbitration generally and maritime arbitration in particular. In the recently published White & Case survey carried out by Queen Mary University 64 percent of those interviewed gave London as a preferred choice of arbitration venue or “seat”. In the field of maritime arbitration (based on another report published recently
by international law firm HFW) it is apparent that some 80 percent of international maritime arbitrations have their seat in London. Almost all are conducted as ad hoc rather than institutional arbitrations under the Terms or Procedures of the LMAA with a small number conducted under the institutional rules of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA).
The principal reasons cited are:
• Availability of experienced specialist counsel, solicitors and experts.
• Availability of experienced specialist arbitrators (particularly in the maritime field).
• The experience of the English Commercial Court in exercising its supervisory jurisdiction and in ordering “interim measures” such as injunctions and document or property preservation orders.
• Relative cost and speed. • The wealth of English commercial and maritime case law.
The Report • September 2018 • Issue 85 | 49
            
Page 1  |  
Page 2  |  
Page 3  |  
Page 4  |  
Page 5  |  
Page 6  |  
Page 7  |  
Page 8  |  
Page 9  |  
Page 10  |  
Page 11  |  
Page 12  |  
Page 13  |  
Page 14  |  
Page 15  |  
Page 16  |  
Page 17  |  
Page 18  |  
Page 19  |  
Page 20  |  
Page 21  |  
Page 22  |  
Page 23  |  
Page 24  |  
Page 25  |  
Page 26  |  
Page 27  |  
Page 28  |  
Page 29  |  
Page 30  |  
Page 31  |  
Page 32  |  
Page 33  |  
Page 34  |  
Page 35  |  
Page 36  |  
Page 37  |  
Page 38  |  
Page 39  |  
Page 40  |  
Page 41  |  
Page 42  |  
Page 43  |  
Page 44  |  
Page 45  |  
Page 46  |  
Page 47  |  
Page 48  |  
Page 49  |  
Page 50  |  
Page 51  |  
Page 52  |  
Page 53  |  
Page 54  |  
Page 55  |  
Page 56  |  
Page 57  |  
Page 58  |  
Page 59  |  
Page 60  |  
Page 61  |  
Page 62  |  
Page 63  |  
Page 64  |  
Page 65  |  
Page 66  |  
Page 67  |  
Page 68  |  
Page 69  |  
Page 70  |  
Page 71  |  
Page 72  |  
Page 73  |  
Page 74  |  
Page 75  |  
Page 76  |  
Page 77  |  
Page 78  |  
Page 79  |  
Page 80