search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADVERTORIAL


Ensuring the best structure for your business


There are four basic structures through which a farm might trade and this article will explain some of the advantages and disadvantages of each from a commercial and from a taxation point of view.


Sole trader


Many farms will start up using this method of trading. All income and expenditure is recorded and taxed in the year that it is earned, regardless of the drawings taken from the business by the farmer. The tax rate is anywhere between 20% and 45% depending on earnings with a further uplift for NIC Class 4 beginning at 9%.


This structure has a number of advantages – its simplicity,


its cheapness to administer and the freedom to claim certain personal expenses for tax purposes that would be restricted in other structures.


The main disadvantages are that the farmer has completely unlimited liability and the taxation bill may become large in ratio to the drawings, particularly when profits are retained in the farm for investment.


Partnership


A partnership has many of the flexibilities of a sole trader and the added advantage that profits can be divided amongst two or more individuals. We would normally advise this structure when a sole trader farmer finds himself regularly being taxed at more than 40% so that his profits can be subdivided to reduce the tax bill.


Limited Liability Partnership


A Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is a partnership that, as the name suggests, permits the liability of the partners to be limited. This is clearly an advantage if the farm partnership perceives that there are risks in the business that the partners would like to control. This protection comes at a cost because the accounts are typically more expensive to prepare than a basic partnership and also parts of the accounts have to be displayed publicly at Companies House.


Limited company


If a farmer wants to either limit their liability or is concerned at high taxation levels, we would often advise that some or all of the business is transferred into a limited company. The advantage is that company profits are taxed at


19%, certainly lower than 40% or 45%, if a sole trader or a partnership. But to extract the profits, further tax has to be paid. Normally dividends are the most effective route. For a basic rate tax payer, dividends over £2,000 are taxed at 7.5%, and for higher rate tax payers at 32.5% or 38.1% for a top rate tax payer. Farmers’ averaging is not available to limited companies, so profits cannot be smoothed over a five year period and as in the case of an LLP, the annual accounts have to be sent to Companies House. In addition, certain personal expenses that can be claimed if trading as an unincorporated business cannot be claimed in a limited company and assets such as cars may need to be kept out of the limited company.


In setting up a limited company, particularly for farmers using the herd basis, it is possible to achieve a tax-free uplift on the value of the herd. The farmer can then draw down on this from the limited company without paying tax. The scope of this article is only intended as an introduction to what is a very complicated topic. If you would like some further advice, please do not hesitate to contact me.


Tim Maris | Partner | 01763 247321 | t.maris@uhy-uk.com www.uhy-uk.com | Cambridge, Letchworth and Royston


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76