construction sector. Saving energy reduces the carbon footprint

and makes a vital contribution in the drive for carbon-neutral buildings. It also saves money by reducing the running costs of the building. When considering large buildings, particu-

larly in the metal shed sector, the traditional targets of improved thermal performance and minimised air-leakage have now reached their optimum performance levels. Put simply, further increases in insulation levels now deliver limited benefit. Specifiers and clients are becoming focussed on the significant contribution that can be obtained by designing natural daylight into buildings, and seeking the best rooflight solutions to deliver this free resource. Depending on the type of lighting system installed, the cost of lighting a building can be more than ten times the cost of the heat saved by removing the rooflights. In many building designs, the cost of the lighting can be four times that of the heat losses when ‘light to heat’ balance has been considered. Even with low energy LED systems, this ratio can still be as high as three times. Accordingly, the daylighting plan is now becoming a principal consideration in the building envelope design and specification process. The emphasis on this critical design aspect

means that specifiers are now faced with a veritable haze of information and choices they can make on rooflight specifications.

Make Sure You’re Seen in The Right Light T

he need to produce energy-efficient buildings is a key consideration in today’s sustainability-focussed

there is no single solution. It is also important to understand that

there are laws of physics that cannot be changed. In glazing and glass reinforced polyester rooflight systems, most of the heat energy from the sun is transmitted directly and in the visible spectrum. Plastics such as polycarbonate have more energy transmission in the infra-red regions and beyond. This means that it is simply not possible to deliver any system with an unachievable mix of high light and low solar transmission levels. The same is true for specifications which

adopt only some elements of a ‘holistic package’ design in isolation. In the right building, it is sometimes possible to use smaller areas of rooflights than would normally be considered adequate, but these may be designed and intended for use in conjunction with additional offsetting renew- able energy sources. Even using rooflights that deliver exceptionally high light transmis- sion levels, poor distribution - or inadequate areas of rooflighting - can create uneven and unsatisfactory levels of light balance within the building. Similarly, whilst the improved thermal performance of rooflights can reduce heat loss, the inclusion of increasingly numerous ‘clear’ insulating layers or cells can be counter-productive. Each layer or cell adds an additional light reflective surface into the assembly. These cumulatively reduce the level of light transmitted into the building, poten- tially costing more than the small savings in heat retention. There is no trade-off on non-fragility. It is

Like every other component within the building envelope, rooflights must perform several functions: • They must deliver good light transmission • This must not create excessive solar gains • They must deliver adequate heat retention • They must provide a non-fragile roof assembly

• They must deliver a well-lit building with the right kind of light Not all these requirements are complemen-

tary. It is important to strike the right balance for each building design, and understand that

about safety and saving lives, and no-one within the specification chain has the right to gamble with it. Rooflights can be made stronger by making the material thicker and more substantial, but in metal cladding systems, this can come at a cost. Installation fit and weatherproof sealing becomes harder to achieve, but innovative reinforcement methods are now available delivering high impact and tear resistance in lighter, thinner sheet formats. Finally, we come to the question of which

kind of illumination is best for the building. High levels of light streaming through small openings in the roof - no matter how well diffused - inevitably deliver a mixture of glare and gloom. This is further worsened by increased shadows created within the build- ing by both the fixtures & fittings, and the occupants. Achieving a good ‘average’ level of daylighting within a building is very different

PICTURED ABOVE This is often claimed as ‘100 per cent diffusion’


This is what the designer expects from 100 per cent diffusion

to delivering good uniformly distributed daylight. This avoids the need for additional and localised supplementary artificial light- ing. Glare and gloom can be significantly reduced by higher levels of diffusion from the rooflight. GRP, by its very nature, spreads daylight omni-directionally within the build- ing and can make a major contribution to internal illumination uniformity and comfort levels. But responsible specifiers must always recognise that diffusion alone cannot deliver the uniformity of lighting that is so often assumed or taken for granted. There are great savings and positive contri-

butions to be made by incorporating rooflights into a building envelope. With every specification element, it is important to understand the need to strike a meaningful balance between the performance options of the rooflight.




Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36